Twin Peaks – Resist Snitch Disclosure To Bitter End

Radio Legendary ^ | 11/2/2017

[BlueDragon]

Please, my niggah (you hypocrite), please answer the questions.

Was there enough 'magic' in the words above?

If not, then please, have your imaginary friend freepmail the secret password to me.

Yet too, if so (if there was a Magic Word in there somewhere) then please, feel free to assume that 'magic' be carried forward through all further correspondence.

[Strac6]

“Please, my niggah”

I don’t answer questions for knuckle-dragging racist morons. I served with too many great Black soldiers in RVN to acknowledge either your lack of intelligence and/or the blatantly obvious lack of a good moral upbringing from your parents.

For me to answer a question from you, you must first apologize to two of my friends; Ben Carson, M.D. and Stanford Professor Dr. Shelby Steele.

I will forward your apologies to them. If they accept them, I will answer your question.

But I doubt I will have to answer, as I’m sure you don;t have the guts to apologize.

Kind of reminds me of your drug-dealing murdering motorcycle gang friends and/or relatives. Like all cowards, great in a group when they outnumber the opposition, but individually, wimps, often with (no so well) hidden homosexual desires.

BTW, Did you ever ask one of your prior therapists for the Freudian reason you chose the name BlueDraggon?

[BlueDragon]

I don’t answer questions for knuckle-dragging racist morons.

Fine. But I'm none of those things.

If you'd taken the time to follow the links I'd embedded in comment #80 it should have been plain that I'm no racist -- or even if I were -- it would not be for reason of anything I posted to you here.

You are still entirely without excuse for your hypocrisy, regardless of what anyone else does, or does not do. Any actual fault of my own (if there was actual fault on my own part, rather than only in your imagination that there was, dawg) would not preclude yourself from being a hypocrite.

For me to answer a question from you, you must first apologize to two of my friends; Ben Carson, M.D. and Stanford Professor Dr. Shelby Steele.

That's awfully rich coming from a man who boasted to the forum here that when he was in Africa, some called him Bwana.

Your two friends, you say? Really now? After they send to me acknowledgement that they accept your own apology for "being racist", then you could feel free to inquire of them both: Were their feelings hurt (by what I posted here in FR comment) too? Have them send freepmail to me describing what the butthurts I may have caused them are. You too could explain what it is that you think I would need apologize for.

But before going to effort to answer that question -- try going to the links supplied in #80. It would be far less time consuming. Trust me on this...

From there (being as I'm telegraphing here that I agree with the 'Above The Law' article in being against the blatant ill-logic, and inherent racism exhibited by LEO's and Courts in Louisiana in that case) it could presumed my own sentiments be more the exact opposite than 'racism'. Maybe you should tell Snoop Dog, Easy E, and Ice Cube that they be a racist, mah' homey? Yo! Here's a FR thread about the "magic word" dawg. Now do you get it? If you do not, then you have no place to be slinging around the term :moron:, not in my direction, anyhow.

It is amazing though, what lengths you go to, to give excuse for yourself avoiding answering any questions posed to you (unless you chose to use the opportunity of 'supplying answer' to shit on somebody, as I'd mentioned previously is your habit) even as you do seem to require that questions that you pose to others be replied to, or else failure to do so signals something more ominous -- or in the least -- proves the charges inherently laden in "loaded" questions such as you pose, be true. If that kind of secret signalling be valid across the board --- then man, oh, man -- woops! I mean 'muy niggah! things is lookin' ba-aad for U, Homes! Why U B steppin' on YuR own junk like that so much?

But I doubt I will have to answer, as I’m sure you don;t have the guts to apologize.

It is fully yourself who absolutely refuses offering any apology whatsoever. That much should be plain to any who has witnessed the multiple conversations that you and I have been having, for months now...

Perhaps, have the two persons you mentioned read this thread, from right here on FR. Send them links to this thread, and to other "Twin Peaks Biker" threads (where you shat down stinking piles of indiscriminate accusation) then ask them too what they think of all this.

I would expect that either of them would have sense enough to follow links provided to see what it was I was talking about on this thread (in comment #80) and why I'd switched to vernacular, dawg. N'om whut'm sayin'?

Your demand that I apologize to two well known celebrities also causes me to become truly concerned --- you may not be a "Federal Agent", or a even lawyer working for some goobermint alphabet agency, but may be truly insane.

The only other possibility I can see is that this pretense (that you have taken umbrage over allegedly "racist" talk) is just so much more "acting" and deceitfulness on your part. In context of everything else that's been said, that last makes more sense than the other potentialities (best fits the evidence) and so is what I identify here as "most likely".

Kind of reminds me of your drug-dealing murdering motorcycle gang friends and/or relatives.

"My"? What's this "my" you keep talking about? There are none that fit that description in my life, and circle of friends (and/or relatives) --- not even close.

In the next room is my deceased brother's son. He is not "Straight Outtta' Compton" but he is straight out of South Central (near to Century Blvd, & Main). The house he grew up in was the first house on the block that was sold to a black man...who was a 'great' uncle to himself. I told the young man if he ever needed a place to live -- or just needed out of South Central for a while, or for years -- he could live in my house. I sent train fare and picked him up at the station.

You have no idea who are talking to. bwaaaHaAhaaHAA!

Like all cowards, great in a group when they outnumber the opposition, but individually, wimps, often with (no so well) hidden homosexual desires.

That must be another case of yourself "projecting" onto me what's your very own suppressed guilt, and self-guilt that you're in denial of.

As a brief aside --just think of all the money I've been saving you from needing pay a therapist. You could contribute to freepathons, say, 25% or so of what an analyst would charge for counseling sessions -- and still be series $$dollar$$ ahead. Think of it as a win-win?

Meanwhile, I've been standing up to everything you could throw at me, pretty much alone. If you came at me in person, and alone -- I'm certain I'd have no problem dispatching you in short order. Come and get some, dawg? woof

BTW, Did you ever ask one of your prior therapists for the Freudian reason you chose the name BlueDraggon?

There's only one "g" in dragon.

But -- it would be a twisted up thing of some beauty though, to take a reason derived from 'Freud' (or even Becker whom I admire, and Rank -- whom Becker admired) and have that serve as explanation for why I chose that name. I'd like to see it. That kind of thing could be good for inducing genuine belly-laugh. Got any theories you'd like to share? bwaahaahAA! (I'm laughing already!)

My name here, that I've had for 17 and half years --- who wants to know 'bout 'dat? Federal agents? lol

Those guys are real tough when they travel in packs, n'om wut'm sayin' dawg?

Maybe you could have some of those Feds "freepmail" me. You know, along with yourself asking some of the rest of your imaginary friends send me some mail? I'd dearly love to hear from them. I truly would.

Have the [alleged] psychiatrist lady drop me a line. If she's going to be diagnosing people over the internet (from a few paragraphs read in isolation from context from which those arose) perhaps (if that "friend" were not figment of your imagination --or else more simply only a ruse that you employed) it is her that (along with your self) owes apology...

From Psychiatrists fight over the ethics of diagnosing Trump;

Psychologists and psychiatrists have codes of ethics that discourage them from giving professional opinions about the mental health of a person who has disclosed information about himself or herself through the media but whom they have not examined personally. They also need authorization from that person to share that opinion.

[snip]

n the 38 pages of psychiatrists' comments, some said they could not diagnose him "by merely observing him on TV or reading what he writes," but those who were critical of Goldwater labeled the candidate in unflattering terms, calling him a "dangerous lunatic," "paranoid" and a "counterfeit figure of a masculine man." Some accused him of having an "impulsive quality," said he was "emotionally too unstable" and said he had a "Godlike self-image."

[snip]

...the American Psychiatric Association decided, and in 1973, the Goldwater Rule became a part of its code of ethics.

The rule states: "On occasion psychiatrists are asked for an opinion about an individual who is in the light of public attention or who has disclosed information about himself/herself through public media. In such circumstances, a psychiatrist may share with the public his or her expertise about psychiatric issues in general. However, it is unethical for a psychiatrist to offer a professional opinion unless he or she has conducted an examination and has been granted proper authorization for such a statement."

underlining and bolding added for emphasis

If this individual (the "psychiatrist" you used to call me drug addled drunk) does in fact exist, and provided to you what you claimed that she did, what she had done, particularly if she'd gotten wind that you would be using that to "attack" some anonymous person online --who had been criticizing you and things you've said-- that you had also been expressing opinion could be having real and actual psychological troubles, to the point they could be dangerous for people to be around -- remember?) it is a violation of psychiatric ethics for her to have done as you described the activity to have occurred.

If you actually are attorney at law in good standing -- you should have known better than to engage in such low-brow, unethical (and potentially dangerous) activity. But then again, you really don't believe the stuff you'd been posting to me about my alleged psychological "condition". I'll grant you that 'out'. Which of course leaves you still with being damnable liar, which you do have horse-collared 'round your neck regardless of which ways things are vis-a-vis your "friends".

Have her (your imaginary friend?) write me an apology. In the meantime, if she does exist, and truly was your friend, you could contact the forum moderators here at FR to have the comment you posted to me at reply #68 deleted. To protect that person, as a matter of ethics, and as an attorney, you should do so.

But if you won't (and you won't, because that would be too much like yourself needing publicly admit to having been mistaken) and if I accept apology from "your friend" as genuine, then I'll write to Mssrs. Carson, and Steele more directly, including inquiring of them if they know you.

If no answer comes from them -- it would need be assumed that you were inventing relationships with those persons that did not exist.

It is incumbent upon yourself to provide assurance to this forum that you are who you portray yourself to be. It is not up to me to either prove, or else disprove (falsify) the claims you make about yourself.

But there is one place here locally where we could put some of what you claim to the a test.

Tell the forum -- what was your previous freepname?

Let us begin there. After which you could offer apology for having falsely accused myself (and other freepers too, whom it is highly doubtful that the news-ez out of Waco is disturbing to them for reason they are "druggies") and we could all of us 'start over' so to speak.

Do we have a deal? No?

Ok, fine. I know what comes next. Although it is not my name, you may as well call me -Stephen-.

Sing it Mr. Zimmerman

[Strac6]

Do you really admit you wrote all that crazy stuff?

I didn’t realize you had been here 17 years, Wow, that makes you.... here 17 years.

Seriously, when your fixation is on anyone who simply points out that Texas law makes it criminal offenses to deal drugs, to murder someone or to belong to a criminal street (motorcycle) gang that does these things, then, quite frankly, it’s not a credit that you have been here 17 years, It’s a discredit to FR that you have been allowed here for 17 years.

We are all known by the company we keep, and as a lover of drug dealing, murdering motorcycle thugs, you drag everyone on FR down by your presence... and your mental instability is no excuse for it.

By the way, Dr. Carson was with us on the photo safari. We were all addressed by the game guides as “Bwana.” It is a Swahili word. It means “Boss,” or “Employer,” of “Master” which comes from their use of the term for owners of large farms, large ranches or large tract of lands, as in “Master of all he sees” i.e to the horizon.

In closing, due to your repeated racism, stupidity, mental, (I’ll be kind and say “instability) and support for drug dealing motorcycle thug murderers, I simply will do as I would advise others to do. That is to have nothing to do with you or people like you.

That said, as a charitable Christian man, I do advise you to get some serious professional help. You are much more of a danger to yourself and others than you realize. The severity of your illness is demonstrated by the fact that you refuse to recognize it.

I will pray for you and your family. Bahati njema

[BlueDragon]

Seriously, when your fixation is on anyone who simply points out that Texas law makes it criminal offenses to...

Fixation? On this thread, initially I pointed out a few things you got wrong. For that you called me a "druggie" and worse. It's been back-and-forth ever since. You seem to think you should be afforded the last word.

Since that time I first pointed out to you error regarding assertions you had made, I've been responding to the garbage you keep spewing at me, pointing out to you that you're also wrong about things between me, and you -- all wrong, supplying the whys and wherefores of that.

You keep squirming around.

First, you serve up false accusation about freepers here (beyond merely only myself) in reply to things I've been pointing out to about yourself, that are in evidence within the your own words.

Then, you say that "you'll pray" for me.

After that, it's back to calling me a drunk, and a drug user, and crazy, and whatever you can dream up that may discredit the observations I've been making. Hardly ever do you deal directly with those observations. When you do, it's often with non- sequitur, and extraneous info that's neither here, nor there.

We are all known by the company we keep, and as a lover of drug dealing, murdering motorcycle thugs, you drag everyone on FR down by your presence... and your mental instability is no excuse for it.

At this point the charges presented against me in the above italicized is sort-of like "fruit of a poisoned tree" kind of thing. You begin in error, then keep on going. The above italicized is also well beyond category of having merely entered "asked and answered". How many times must I deal with that sort of SHIT out of you?

If we had been talking face-to-face, that kind of talk would have come to an abrupt end long ago. But no, you're a chickenshit keyboard commando that's all wee-wee'd up because every thing you throw at me keeps getting smashed right back in your face. When are you going to learn? You'll never defeat me. You're simply not righteous.

By the way, Dr. Carson was with us on the photo safari.

The habit you have of using "by the way" and "btw" is annoying. A "photo safari". Wow. So impressive. And it was at this "photo Safari" that you were referred to as "Bwana"?

Do you recall the context where you first bragged that term was one of your titles, one of the names that you went by? You posted that sort of thing in response to myself demanding that you tell the forum here what your previous freep-name was. You supplied a braggadocio list of other "names" you've been known by.

A Big Trip to Africa. And Mr. Carson was there? So? Does that make him some sort of "friend" of yours? Really?

You failed to explain why I would need apologize to that man. I said nothing against him. I seriously doubt he'd be upset with anything I'd posted, either.

Did you go to the link I pointed you back towards, and see how that related to your use of the term "the "magic" word?

The word dawg sure was a magic word for one black man. It was turned into magic spell against himself that was intoned back "at" himself by the priesthood to empower minions of the cult while stripping that black man of his Constitutionally protected civil rights.

We were all addressed by the game guides as “Bwana.” It is a Swahili word.

Swahili word. No kidding. In the last previous reply to you, to which youb are now responding, I'd posted link to the etymology of the word.

I have men call me "Boss" that I'm not in position of authority over. Although it's a manner of speech in some present-day American subcultures -- I usually thank them, while reminding them too -- "I'm not your boss" and working into the situation "I am but a man, such as yourself".

Young men from somewhere in the nearby neighborhood environs (but whom I do not know, at all) strolling by when I'm sitting on my front porch have more than once sang out greeting to me, "O-G!" . Yet I'm no gangster. Still, I'll wave back, and give them a "hey!".

In closing, due to your repeated racism,

Now you just stop right there, you son-of-a-bitch. WHAT racism? Hmmm? Show me. Or STFU. Racism... and "repeated" the man says! phfft. More lies out of your mouth. You sound JUST LIKE the people who, not being able to oppose what Trump, and Trumps' supporters have to say about things gin-up charge of "racism".

"...stupidity, "

Huh? Here it's been myself that has had to break things down for you into small bite-sized pieces (since you never seem to catch on to my meanings the first time) -- and you STILL don't get it! You're almost as much of an idiot as Princess Puddles. Just ~wow~.

mental, (I’ll be kind and say “instability)

Skipped right past the part, did you(?) about yourself having allegedly dragged a psychiatrist into supporting that accusation would have been an ethics violation, if it wasn't an imaginary tale that you had pulled out of your ass.

If you were not making things up --have her contact me here, and provide a phone number I could reach her at. That would settle that issue.

"...and support for drug dealing motorcycle thug murderers,

No matter what, I see you won't let go of that particular highly "loaded" false accusation.

That is to have nothing to do with you or people like you.

Ha. You've got nothing. Nothing but lies and your butthurt over myself having repeatedly whipped your lying ass in epic forum conversation take-down dismantlement. Bring it, dawg. woof

That said, as a charitable Christian man,

Well don't that just beat all? You've not been "charitable" with myself, not one farthing's worth. And no --- "charitable" does not necessarily mean $$$.

I do advise you to get some serious professional help.

For what? For having points of view differing from your own shallow, highly egotistical viewpoints wherein (going by how you speak of your "self") you're always the starring hero of your own movie?. Get bent, fool.

You are much more of a danger to yourself and others than you realize.

Ha. lol. But as I pointed out to you -- if that was indeed true -- no scratch that -- it need not need be true "indeed", it could be limited to needing be true only in your own opinion, and the opinion of your imaginary friend (the alleged psychiatrist) for the both of you to be guilty of ethics violations -- your friend the more-so, of course.

But I have a solution for it. Fall on your sword -- admit you were just making things up (about the supposed friend you had over just last night for a barbecue -- for whom you had printed off a comment I'd posted to you for her to read, etc.) to protect you so-called friend from potential legal harm due to her's (and your?) ethics violation. It would not be possible to plead that I was in realm of the "hypothetical non-patient", not in context of what you said and how you said it.

But no real worries -- I'm not planning on filing formal complaint, nor would consider doing so. Yet if that person were real, then they should be told to not do what you said she just did. If everything else you've been saying about me were to be true -- then the two of you would have been making things worse.

The severity of your illness is demonstrated by the fact that you refuse to recognize it.

Oh, brother. There's one of those "can't prove a negative" problemo's AGAIN. Don't you remember? You were agin' it, before as you are here (again) for it.

Send all your friends to this thread, and others, like I'd asked. Have them send me some freepmail. We could talk about you behind your back, then I could talk about that talking about you openly, on this forum. Sound fair? It should. That's about what you say you did to me. What's the diff? Two sets of rules, eh? One set everyone else has to live up to, and then another more conveniently fluid set for the hero of your own movie.

Can't you see that in this, if there actually was serious issue beyond the two of us despising one another --you'd need recuse yourself due to conflict of interest? You're in no place to be providing clinical diagnosis --for a critic of what you have been saying, and how you've been going about saying it. Nor can you invoke some mythical "friend" who could properly diagnose an anonymous stranger over the internet, to use that as some form of interpersonal weapon in public forum. I provided extract from AMA guidelines in the last comment that I'd addressed to you that explains that would be ethics violation. What do you suppose "being bound by" means in regards to AMA ethics guidelines? The "being bound by" does include penalty for going outside of those boundaries. Just food for thought for you (imaginary?) friend.

I will pray for you and your family.

If you're going to pray, it would be best to not do so so loudly, and while standing on a street-corner making sure people saw what a pray-er you are.

You have a way of making mockery of everything even remotely 'holy' that you touch. You know that? I'm trying to tell you -- man -- you gotta' repent. You're walking in darkness but mistake what you *think* you know for The Light.

Bahati njema

And "luck"? What's luck got to do with it? Good grief, what a poseur you are. You make me sick, you hypocrite!

[BlueDragon]

Look carefully on what you said (as will be quoted, and italicized below at the parts that I will bold for emphasis);

Texas law makes it criminal offenses to deal drugs, to murder someone or to belong to a criminal street (motorcycle) gang that does these things.

Do you see how it's the "doing" crime while member of what could be identified as a "gang" rather than the "belong to a ..gang" that is against the law?

b) Do you understand that the law in question here is an enhancement statute?

Do you even understand the question(s)?

I will lay it out this way ---

It is not against the law to be a member of a "gang".FULL STOP Questions? Do you dispute the statement? If not, then we can proceed.

To reassert, to make sure we're clear on this point --that much, that part of overall consideration (simple identifiable membership, alone) is not against laws of the State of Texas, nor laws of the State of California, nor laws of any State (within the United States of America) that I know of.

I think this point, and potential divergence of understanding is where our main disagreements chiefly stem.

If you dispute this -- then tell me now, and make whatever difference of opinion you may have plain.

Yet if you do --please spare us repetition of the viewpoint you hold that MC members are -- drug dealing murderous scum -- etc., etc. -- we've all heard that before a thousand times over by now.

Answer the questions, and answer those narrowly considered before going afield from those into other blah-blah-blah., dawg.

I used a "magic" word. Perhaps even two of those. What will be your excuse for not addressing the subject matter, this time?

Moving on from there, from that pile of muck I sense will soon be impending --then (when you respond) @splat@ delivered like a turd an the pages of a perfectly innocent 'book':

IF it were against the law to merely be "member" of what LE could possibly identify as being a "gang" then rounding people up once they were identified (either rightly, or else wrongly too) of being in a gang would be a simple matter. It would be so simple that it undoubtedly would rapidly begin to present an entire other 'set' (no pun intended) of problems.

What to do with the gangs? Send them away, make them disappear --- would be one of the solutions presented as cure for "the problem". It has happened before. Lets's not be too eager to pave the way for it to happen all over again, Mmm'kay?

Do you understand what I am saying here? If not, then feel free to consult with Dr. Ben Carson. Though one not be required to be an actual brain surgeon to understand the things I'm talking about here, I'm persuaded the good Mr. Carson would see at once what I'm driving at.

[mac_truck]

It’s called Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome or what we used to call ‘wet brains’.”

Lol..its been a while since I've heard that term used.

[BlueDragon]

You liked that one, huh? (did you see the ethics violation notices the way that was brought into discussion brought about? hmm?)

Being as I cannot rationally expect that other son-of-a-bitch to understand simple precepts, and engage in discussion in rational, reasonable manner (narrowly) pertaining to those ---- perhaps you could?

It seems you me that you could.

Do understand what was being talked about in comment #86?

Was there any of that 'syndrome' in evidence there? If so, then knock yourself out, and show where, why, and just how.

[Strac6]

Just one correction... of so many possible ones.

I don’t despise you. I pity you. You were probably once smart and rational, and not in favor of drug dealing, murdering motorcycle thugs.

Then something happened. Probably drugs and/or drinks... and way too many of them... and now you.... are you.

Hate filled, irrational, (and blind to it,) promoting criminal behavior...

That is a shame.

[BlueDragon]

Just one correction... of so many possible ones.

I don’t despise you. I pity you.

Hold on a sec. I did not use the word "despise" in the post you have addressed this reply of yours to. I used that word in the next posted comment. But I see the game. You refuse to reply to comments that seriously crater your arguments -- or reply to anything where you may have to agree with little 'ol me. Is your ego truly that fragile? Apparently, it is. But just think, man! If you could get through your head that what I was saying about the law itself (that it is not against the law to be a member of a gang) that could go a long way towards ratcheting down the acrimony around here regarding "issues" surrounding the subject matter of this thread. In not too much time also, if we we're to be able to come to some place of 'starting over' it could help raise respect for LE efforts too (thus serving to help squelch the wildest of the wild-eyed, anti-LE conspiracy theories) -- if we were not fighting over the one fundamental difference of opinion that I framed in post #86.

Return to #86 and answer the questions put to you there (with a double heaping helping of the "magic words"!).

Do you want peace among the brethren (that would be -- the citizenry of the US, at large) or must you thrive on instabilities between State (powers) and citizenry? What type of creature is it that you would prefer to be feeding?

The only other option I can see is that (other than merely misunderstanding the one point) you're some sort of relatively shallow-minded 'operator' come to FR to try to steer public perceptions and sentiments. Either way, it must suck to be you. So make "peace" while you have an opportunity -- or else continue suffering being on the losing end of the, ah, politics of personal destruction.

I set in front of you a basket of curses (aimed right at your head) in #85 that was fairly representative of the sort of things I've been saying to you in reaction your own assaults upon my own, and other's character). It's no wonder your poor wittle fee-wings were so hurt.

In #86 I pointed right at just exactly where the fundamental disagreement we have been having arose. If that were to be cleared up -- then things could be so much more rational, and less emotionally driven. I've been trying to get you to focus on that single point for months now (to get it through your head -- anything based upon misunderstanding of that will preclude possibility for rational discussion) but you keep RUNNING AWAY -- which is why I've also painted you to be intellectually, a coward.

You were probably once smart and rational, and not in favor of drug dealing, murdering motorcycle thugs.

I see that myself having singled you out as being a Federal (or possibly only State) agent really got you all "triggered". Whether you are, or possibly not (that latter possibility, perhaps only on the slim picken's side?) when pressured ---- we get to see what comes out of you when the squeeze in on. I'm not the only one around here who sees most of it to be the semi-well camouflaged posturing and posing that it is.

Then something happened. Probably drugs and/or drinks... and way too many of them... and now you.... are you.

Let's see... this kind of tone you're trying to sell... that's part of the standing on street corner virtue-signalling thing you've got goin' on. Next you'll tell me that you'll be a-praying. Like, you're so "concerned" over my own well being? Phfft. Sell that noise on some other corner. It's too late for you to tell me you're such a 'virgin'. Those nylon fishnets (stockings) you're wearing are dirty, and have gaping holes in 'em bigger than the all the littler holes.

Worried about your "image"? Concerned over how others may view you? Uhm. I see. I've been bad for your rep around here, and back at the office where you work -0- those guys are getting a kick out of this. That's the part that's really hard on your ego. (?)

Hate filled, irrational, (and blind to it,) promoting criminal behavior...

I do hate you surely enough (you have succeeding in drawing that out of me, but then again, that was the purpose for yourself being here -- to stir up those Tea Party types, wasn't it?) although I should pity you more than I do, and "hate" less, generally speaking. That's a failing on my own part. A weak point. But promoting criminal behavior? You must have me confused with somebody else. I'm not all those other people who live rent-free in your head (that have railed at LE and prosecutors). I'm only me.

I see too that you won't let go of this "promoting criminal behavior" falsehood that you keep trying to use in personally defensive reaction, hucking it at me, ascribing motives to myself for what I say -- instead of delving into examination of what I state ARE my own motives, and the underlying reasons for those.

But then again, you've got to reach for something to hit at me with in desperate effort to make yourself look good, first -- in your own eyes -- then, in hopes others will believe the bullshitting you keep engaging in.

What I don't get is how it could be possible that you would not be a Fed (or maybe even a DA somewhere, perhaps part of Fed agency legal council. Are you using TOR?) unless you truly are so stupid that you believe your own lies. Or, the other glaringly obvious possibility -- your self-image is so fragile, so brittle-like, that for you to admit to having been mistaken -- publicly -- is just too much.

So which is it? Federal troll -- or fragile ego (azz-hole) who gets his kicks puking at people who oppose himself -- thinking if he can just keep on being a wise-ass (now new and improved! with even more supplemental 'concern'!) it will show how "smart" he is, how moral he himself is, thus he must be right in the rest of his huffin' and puffin? Maybe a blend of those, eh?

I mean, being so dumb -- that one begins to believe their own (and their agency's?) PR (and even lies)---that's about the size of it for a LEO (or former LEO) such as Princess Puddles (aka TG).

But in your case, if we are to believe much of anything that you say for yourself, you're supposed to be one of the more elite. Why is it that you can't even get past the likes of me then? I'm nothing special. If you're a lawyer, you must really suck. Maybe there's some isolated specialty area wherein you have some expertise and don't? Suck, I mean.

What specialty area would that be? C'mon, you can tell the folks here at FR. We're your FRiends ain't we? Well, except for me of course, but shoot, I don't count for much. I'm only one guy.

See you Soon,

Tell us what your previous freepname was, and I'll see if I can coax the old elves into making for you something really special.

---

Watcher Of The Skies

[Strac6]

“I don’t count for much. I’m only one guy.”

Thank God!

[BlueDragon]

I see that you refuse to reply to questions.

What excuse do you have for that failure, this time?

You can't say I didn't use the 'magic' word(s).

What else is there?

Can't get over your butthurts? Is that it?

[BlueDragon]

Thank God!

Why drag Him into this?

If you can't fool me what makes you think He would be fooled by your dodgy-dodge avoidance maneuverings ?

But since you did invoke Him, has it ever occurred to you that you should be thanking God that I am here, and that I have pointed out to you where and how you continually go wrong?

If you're going to be hanging around loudly "praying" "for" me -- why don't you ask Him that question?

He may even answer. You could maybe hear His voice.

Wouldn't that be nice? Finally -- someone you could trust!

[Strac6]

I’ve told you I’ll be glad to answer your question, once you begin to redeem yourself your blatantly stupid racist comment, to wit: “Please, my niggah;” by apologizing to Dr. Carson and Dr. Steele.

As usual, you demand, deny and try to deflect.

Say you are sorry, nicely, in the form of a well-written message I will relay to them, and we’ll address your question.

Otherwise, get back under your sheet, with the rest of your motorcycle thug gang of drug dealers and murderers.... or back to the locked ward, whichever is easier.

[BlueDragon]

I’ve told you I’ll be glad to answer your question, once you begin to redeem yourself your blatantly stupid racist comment, to wit: “Please, my niggah;” by apologizing to Dr. Carson and Dr. Steele.

But that's purely artifice. A "fake" taking of umbrage. It's not rational that I would need apologize to unaffected parties.

As usual, you demand, deny and try to deflect.

NO! That's What YOU are doing, you goddamned HYPOCRITE!!! You should have the crap beaten out of you. Seriesly.

Every time -- you come up with some chickenshit, flame-baiting, festering pus-pocket of excuses.

Say you are sorry, nicely, in the form of a well-written message I will relay to them, and we’ll address your question.

YOU will relay to them?

I have nothing to apologize to them for. If that not be true -- have them contact me here on FR, and tell me what it was that may have offended them. After which, I'd either explain what it was I was doing (as I made effort to do for you) or possibly apologize to them directly.

Otherwise, get back under your sheet, with the rest of your motorcycle thug gang of drug dealers and murderers.

Now you're calling me KKK? You say that to a man who has black relatives. Living in his own house. BY INVITATION.

And the "motorcycle thug gang of dealers and murderers" part -- labeling that as being "mine" too? You are well on your way to Hell for bearing false witness. In the Lord's own economy bearing false witness is akin to murdering somebody. Yet there you go -- at this stage of your life making it your life's work!

This is all going according to your own preferred pattern. You are an intellectual coward who simply refuses to contemplate (at the least --openly confess) that -- oh my gosh! he could have been wrong!

If that's not the case -- then you absolutely must be a Federal agent, trolling FR.

Regardless --- either way you are a steaming pile that should be banned from FR (like you possibly were before, re-tread).

[Strac6]

Jeez, another day, another of your crazy temper tantrum screeds.

If you do not understand that calling someone a “niggah”, (your word, not mine,) is racist, then what little possible hope I had for you is now long gone.

And that is after you have African Americans sharing your home? Well, I guess whatever you charge them does help pay the rent on the double wide.

By the way, in your attempts to dodge questions, you remind be of the time I deposed Jesse Jackson. “The Rev.” was a master of speaking endlessly and saying nothing. His answer to one question took 26 minutes, and contained no factual information.

You type for time endless, and say nothing and display nothing but increasingly deranged fits of mental masturbation.

Additionally, if you were anything other than the internet version of the Village Idiot, I’d worry about your delusional accusations, such as “You’re some Federal Secret Agent.” but don’t worry, everyone here understands what they... and you... are.

Like I said, get some professional help... and stop chewing up Jim’s bandwidth with your lunacy.

[2nd amendment mama]

but don’t worry, everyone here understands what they... and you... are.

And just what are you inferring that I and "everyone" else here is? Can't wait for this answer.

[BlueDragon]

Jeez, another day, another of your crazy temper tantrum screeds.

Temper tantrum, eh? You call me a racist, and even worse --and what should be expected? I'm supposed to thank you?
Yet isn't it true that you kept up with hurling any kind of abuse my way that you could (calling me "crazy" and "a druggie" etc. etc.,) in part because you were wanting something you could label as such? We've seen you use this method before. In the past I identified it as demonic. Remember that? You never seem to remember anything -- if it's not small, and short, and one dimensional, it seems beyond your ability to recall.

You refuse to respond to reason, and keep coming up with new excuses for your rank hypocrisy. I wasn't willing to allow you to get away with it. So sue me? I'm doing you favors here -- but you don't realize it.

It's amazing to me just how oblivious to your own self you seem to be -- which is part of why I considered that it must be "an act" for you to be so stinking dense.

But you've got me wondering -- are you truly as stupid as it seems like you're play-acting (for effect -- to keep this conversation going, to help distance us from where in the conversation a crucial point was touched on)?

Eh -- some of your "stupid" could be chalked up to intellectual laziness, I suppose. That too could fit the conversational evidences, thus be rational hypothesis. You think you already know all the right answers, and so do not need to reconsider any of what you think are the legal "points" your overall approach and assertions rely on.

Does that sound about right? Notice here I did not ask you for your own "opinions" of what my own understanding of aspects of Texas laws may be -- do us all a favor and do not offer those opinions (I've already heard those dozens of times) at least not until after having addressed questions put to you as those are written. Is that too much to ask?

If you do not understand that calling someone a “niggah”, (your word, not mine,) is racist, then what little possible hope I had for you is now long gone.

Are you truly so dense? I mean, really --- are you -- or is this just an act?

Did you ever check the context of the other 'magic' word, which word is dawg? Certainly you could answer that last question?

You asked for a magic word. Or should I say, told me that because I "didn't say the magic word" that was reason why you would not answer questions, even just prior to myself having provided link to 'dem 'magic' words reasons for introduction into this thread, and "the phrase "muy niggah" entered first into the conversation here, dawg.

After toying around with the idea of magic words (you were making a game out of "magic words" were you not?) -- I brought that magic dawg into the equation.

A black man had been denied his constitutional rights to not be subjected to interrogation outside presence of legal council. The black man had spoken in vernacular, and had included the word "dog" when making request for a lawyer. Because he had included that word -- seemingly by "magic" that rendered his appeal to Constitutional protections void, according to LE agencies, and the Supreme Court of Louisiana.

That is from where, and was the motivation for myself speaking that strain of vernacular to you, dawg. I was talking "magic words". Don't you 'get' it? As I'd suggested, ask Ben Carson to explain it to if still do not understand it. You say that you would forward an apology (which you demand that I make) to Carson for his perusal, or else-- you would continue to refuse to answer any questions -- much as you had been refusing for to do so for quite some time, even prior to yourself raising accusation that I said "racist" things. Who in the hell wouldn't see yourself making that kind of conditional demand as game-playing?

Those 'magic' words sure did put a spell on you -- that is, if it's not either of the below, or some combination;

1) that your so damn dumb that you didn't get it -- did not understand how I was pointing towards the inherent superficiality of using appeal to having not submitted the proper "form" as excuse for refusing to address wrongdoing -- in this instance -- yours, and your own refusals to address questions posed to you that had been your habit prior to myself ever saying "magic words" that just so happen to be on prohibited listings too. Go ask Snoop and Ice T. They made a bundle off of using prohibited 'magic' words without needing rely on an older list of such coming from G. Carlin.

2) you were too lazy to have gone and looked to see what it was I was talking about -- even after the first time I sketched a schematic flow chart sort of thing for how those other "magic words" entered into the conversation (this is the second time) -- with it needing be remembered here that is was yourself who gave me the smart-ass excuse that is was because I didn't "say the magic word" you would not need to answer any questions so therefor not need to publicly acknowledge your blatant hypocrisy.

3) you are now pretending to still not understand because it fits in with the "game" you're playing

4) this game of yours is sure to infuriate, to give you something to bitch about (you deceitful, lying sack of crap!)

Are you a black man? If not, how could myself having referred to you as 'mah niggah' -- within the context I did so -- immediately following having supplied link to an Above The Law article which was obviously critical of racist LE and State of Louisiana courts who played along with the LE game-playing (gaming the legal system) be "racism", and not only that, but be personally insulting to Ben Carson (of all people!)?

Should "white people" who say the wrong 'magic words' be forced to bow down and apologize to "black" persons for having used words (in particular setting, and for effect, not for "racist" reasons) that are on a list of words prohibited to be pronounced by "white" people but can be said (and sung) by people who just so happen to be black (but no one else)?

And that is after you have African Americans sharing your home? Well, I guess whatever you charge them does help pay the rent on the double wide.

The young man is mixed race and is provided free room and board, with any other necessary expenses put on one of the cards in my own wallet. And no...not a 'manufactured housing' unit, though speaking of double-wides one comes to mind that was rather pleasant. A couple of old biddies I was once acquainted with lived there (now since long passed on).

Shouldn't it be getting to you by now -- NOTHING you say against me in justification for yourself being such an asshole as you've been on these pages -- ever turns out to be true?

You make up lies, then post them with no qualifying notice of "this is a possibility" (while providing reason for why) and if not that, then; this other reason could be possibility, etc. But then again I tell you plainly and truly what the deal is with myself, but you never accept it since it does not fit with the false accusation narratives you're pimping here on FR.

It's fully like -- you KNOW that YOU are a LIAR so ASSUME everyone else is TOO (or something). You're such a damageable liar I'm left to fish around for what's the real truth about you. You won't even tell us what your previous freepname was, for crying out loud.

By the way, in your attempts to dodge questions, you remind be of the time I deposed Jesse Jackson.

I've not dodged a single question, not any legitimate ones (rare as those have been coming from you) -- I've even addressed (and unloaded) many "loaded" questions. For that, I'm said to have "ranted". It takes time and effort to unpack the garbage you spew -- to show it for what it is, then flush it.

“The Rev.” was a master of speaking endlessly and saying nothing.

What does that have to do with me? I say things. It is yourself who is avoiding answering questions -- by any means possible.

His answer to one question took 26 minutes, and contained no factual information.

Yet with myself here, when you are not dodging questions, or just being an all around jackass about things, you attempt to introduce "facts" that are not factual. Even after those have been examined and found to be unsure footing for some new angle you'd trying out to keep yourself from needing admit you've been wrong about a LOT of things that I've been pointing out...you come back to repeat the same nonsense, over and over.

It's taken myself much more than 25 minutes to show that you state virtually "no" facts, yourself. Here again, you tried to form a weapon to be used against this little black duck, and the charges ended up on the topsides of your own feet. When are you going to learn? How many times must you keep knotting the very noose that ends up around your own neck?

You type for time endless, and say nothing and display nothing but increasingly deranged fits of mental masturbation.

Others than your own self would need be the judges of that.

I've been trying for months to get you to focus upon a single crucial precept. You fight me every step of the way...leading me to believe --it must be deliberate effort on your part for the information be misunderstood as you would prefer it to be misunderstood. It has to be that, or else you do not understand the laws (and the case law pertaining to them) preferring them to be fuzzily stretched towards possibility for criminal conviction for persons belonging to groups you do not approve of. But no, this is not a place where you can simple say "drug dealing biker scum!" and be done with it. But you wanted to, didn't you?

And here we are, getting further and further away from the posted comment that isolated that crucial point (precept) I'd mentioned, framed in simple to read and understand manner. It's in the top portion of #86

As I had said a bit further down within that same comment (#86), in hopes of dragging the conversation into more useful realms;

" I think this point, and potential divergence of understanding is where our main disagreements chiefly stem.

If you dispute this -- then tell me now, and make whatever difference of opinion you may have plain."

There, right there was opportunity for yourself to do something other than the lazy-ass masturbatory approach that has been your own stock in trade on each and every Waco Twin Peaks thread that you've posted comment on.

... and stop chewing up Jim’s bandwidth with your lunacy.

Answer questions that are posed to you (for a change) and I would not need to hound you. All of this could be much, much shorter, simpler, and easier. But that's obviously not the way you to want things to be -- not unless you should be allowed to come to this forum and crap all over numerous members with impunity. That's not the way things work around here. So, ah -- don't talk to me about "bandwidth". You have no standing to raise complaint.

Additionally, if you were anything other than the internet version of the Village Idiot, I’d worry about your delusional accusations, such as “You’re some Federal Secret Agent.” but don’t worry, everyone here understands what they... and you... are.

I've had more than one freeper thank me for my efforts, and one on this thread referred to you as "slime".

So yeah, people here understand more than you give them credit for. They can see through you as much as I can. If you're not in employ of Federal agency -- (which could help explain your own forum discussion methodologies) then you must be some combination of "dense" (that means -- lacking capability for understanding) and an all-around jerk.

I've given you plenty of opportunities to be reasonable -- but you've sailed right by every one of those, yourself reliably alighting upon only something that really gets your goat, or else some small snippet among what I write to you that you can be an asshole about, giving an asshole's response to it.

So be man for a change, instead of a butthurt intellectual coward who refuses to grasp the subject matter, and the ramifications of the various aspects of the subject matter, so in the future I at least can speak about those things myself instead of needing to be always trying to drag you to doing so.

You spew phrases like "drug dealing murderers" as intellectual shortcut, then try to link myself to those persons -- including at least *some* of whom are not drug dealers, or is a murderer, such as Matthew Clendennen.

It is from there also (my own mentions of men such as Clendennen) that reason arises for myself to have attempted to point out to you, and to every and anyone who has interest in Waco Twin Peaks discussions, aspects of legal considerations discussed in my own comment at #86.

If you're going to argue further with me --please begin from there -- quoting from there specifically what you have disagreement with. None of this editorializing strawman conversion of what I have said to make it easier for you to bat away as if it were nothing. That way of doing things is your usual, and it truly sucks.

So, -- if you're going to keep on like you have, and say things that are in reality saying nothing (except that your all butthurt and don't like me, so make stuff up to insult me, trying to "get even" with me) -- why not just shut up, and save us the misery of needing deal with your nothingness, and wall-to-wall lying about everything?

Send that email to Dr. Carson. Provide to him link to this thread, so that he could see the context. You invoked that man's name, saying you would be the go-between. There's no excuse for not inquiring of himself if he thought that I do owe himself some form of apology. Let's settle that part -- first. Is there, or is there not 'cause of action' and allow the good Mr. Carson himself be judge of that.

[BlueDragon]

Can't wait for this answer.

Maybe he'll try to make light of it, and tell you that you "didn't say the magic word", thus provide cover for himself not needing answer to anyone, for anything he says.

He engages in that sort of thing while simultaneously implying that when anyone not answer one of his poisonously loaded questions they run risk of themselves (and their children! think of the children!) being around dangerous people -- like me.

The demand Strac6 made for me to apologize (going through himself, as messenger) to Dr. Ben Carson, and Shelby Steele (those two presented as name-dropping, trying to associate himself with those as "company he keeps") while accusing me of being a druggie, and a racist, and an addled brain drunk sheet-wearing Klansman who is friends with druggie racist murderer bikers (the insinuations being he's so much better than many of the rest of us here at FR -- specially me, of course --because I pull his covers) is almost as ridiculous as presenting demand for Larry David (of all people!) to apologize for being anti-Semitic would be...

Larry David criticized for concentration camp joke on 'Saturday Night Live'

Any of ya'll could tell Shelby Steele I said all that, and ask him if that pisses him off too. I doubt it would, but that man's a thinker, and I do think could figure out why I asked.

Why he would be anything but irritated at being dragged into this, as if he were some sort of presider-over-white-people moral authority (and here) I should be forced to submit apology to by proxy, is anyone's guess.

Mr. Steele could maybe even figure out the non-mr. Strac6 too, as well or better than I, once he got a gandering peak at that latter man's thought processes as those have played out on the pages of FR, provided he cared to bother himself with the nuisance.

I'm not so sure Ben Carson would "understand" on particular, certain levels a man like Strac6, because the good Mr. Carson is simply too much of a nice guy to understand what makes men such as Strac6 tick, or if he did understand, would possibly be too polite to say. I'm speaking of understanding "mind" here, rather than brain, no [further & hidden] insult intended, and none at all intended toward US Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Carson, nor the analytical Mr. Steele.

[Strac6]

When you read his book-length screeds, with racist comments, defending drug dealing murdering motorcycle thug gangs, what do you thing he is.

Read his stuff, and ask yourself, is this really a rational man writing this?

PS, like your forum name tag. Am NRA Life Member. See my tag line.

Have a good week.