To: Blue House Sue
A balloon with a digital camera would be cheaper, and safer.
To: rightwingcrazy
A balloon with a digital camera would be cheaper, and safer. Yeah, but that's been done before and all those photo's are photoshopped .......
Now if he could just get several hundred thousand billion feet^10 higher he could probably prove the moon landing was fake too!
128 posted on
11/21/2017 3:49:25 PM PST by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: rightwingcrazy
I’ve seen a few of those youtubes with the balloons and cameras and a GPS unit to track it with once it lands/falls back to earth. Pretty cool (and relatively cheap) stuff.
160 posted on
11/21/2017 7:59:03 PM PST by
21twelve
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts FDR's New Deal = obama)
To: rightwingcrazy
"A balloon with a digital camera would be cheaper, and safer." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Heck, a simple airline ticket would take him to ~35,000 feet...
162 posted on
11/21/2017 8:06:18 PM PST by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias | "Islamists": Satan's assassins | "Moderate Muslims": Useful idiots.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson