Plausible.
I think they are sacrifices to build a case for Trump having to step down. They are going to say we purged all these bad actors of ours. You have to do the same. They are going to try to make it impossible for any Trump to stay no matter how baseless their accusations are.
It’s possible. This likely wouldn’t be happening if Hillary was president.
The invisible AG Sessions won’t do a thing. He spent too many years in the epicenter of the Swamp.
I think that the President is running an ISO9000 operation
1. Say what you do
2. Do what you say
3. Prove it (with independant audit)
[Spokeshave who was an ISO9000 auditor in a previous job]
Yes. Too coincidental. I also believe this had something to do with the Bannon exit, so he could orchestrate release of the information.
A public statement to this effect would have put everyone on notice. Your theory is quite plausible, but how did Comcast, for example, know it had to fear this?
I believe rather that Andrew Breitbart, followed by Steve Bannon, have been collecting information on the sexual deviancy of the Left for years. Bannon’s brief stint in the White House somehow gave him what he needed to start this highly successful political campaign. Its just a thought - needs fleshing out.
Males - OUT
Whites - OUT
Christians - OUT
Straights - OUT
Mature People - OUT
In the 2020, you will see a sharp decline of white males running for national office. It will be nearly impossible to be vetted or want to be vetted.
How did you get from State and local government employer to private employer out of that section of Code? Maybe I missed something...
I think it’s Hillary or Obama scorching the earth.
Maybe I am missing something, but it seems that the info you cited refers to government employers. How does this apply to the Lauer case (and some of the others)?
Thank you.
I posted a while back that these cases may be a bit of pay back from Trump being accused during the campaign.
This one of many weapons being forged against the deep state.
None of these people had criminal charges brought against them; they were canned by their employer. I guess the days of employers like Fox spending $30-odd million to settle O’Reilly’s misbehavior are over.
They opened the box by trying to weaponize claims of impropriety - they are now eating their own as a result and Trump will leverage it - sweet!
Personally I think it started with Fox.The other stations sat in their office chairs and laughed as Fox was being ripped apart.Now it’s their turn.
Did you miss the language in the statute that limits it to “state and local government employers”?