Posted on 12/05/2017 5:54:45 AM PST by mikelets456
....right after we get the bank records for Fushion GPS and Perkins Coie...
exactly...based on recent revelations of anti-Trump FBI people being part of Mueller’s team Sessions has EVERY right to jump back in- but he won’t...
p
Ah, I understand. Thank you!
done
And grasping at straws too.
Yep....even Bloomberg and FoxNews say ‘un-named sources”....
And this relates to the election how?
Someone needs to do a cartoon of Mueller as Captain Arab with the great white whale as the Russia collusion
Is this an abuse of power? I would hate for an agency to demand my bank records.
Looks like fake news from lying anonymous sources.
- - - -
” Via @JaySekulow lawyer for @realDonaldTrump “We have confirmed that the news reports that the Special Counsel had subpoenaed financial records relating to the President are false. No subpoena has been issued or received. We have confirmed this with the bank and other sources.”
Major Garrett Major Garrett (@MajorCBS) December 5, 2017
https://twitter.com/MajorCBS/status/938137118819397632
“Major Garrett; Verified account @MajorCBS
The “records relating to the President..” language includes the Trump Organization according to @JaySekulow”
It’s the bank whose records were subpoenaed on Trump (and family) accounts, not Trump. He can’t decline, but his attorneys can move to quash the subpoena to Deutsch Bank.
Rip Van Sessions
LMAO!
FAKE NEWS
Thanks for the further clarification. I think we are on the same page - the reason for searching the bank records would be outside of proving tax evasion.
However, since this morning when I commented to your post before going to work, I saw report headlines that the the Deutsche Bank records subpoena was “fake news.” Since Trump has taken on the media and not let up, the MSM seems to be imploding.
Let me suggest to you that *some* of what is being labeled as "fake news" today, until recently, used to be called a "trial balloon."
In other words, "authorities" would plant a story to gauge public reaction, and if that reaction was favorable they would actually do what was rumored to have already been done. If the reaction was violently opposed, they would back off and call the rumor unfounded.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.