To: BenLurkin
First of all, it says a lot about America that they have to explain how to pronounce psyche.
Second, getting all that gold would make gold worthless.
6 posted on
12/06/2017 5:59:08 AM PST by
Terry Mross
(Liver spots And blood thinners..)
To: Terry Mross
7 posted on
12/06/2017 6:02:03 AM PST by
mdmathis6
(Men and Devils can't out-"alinsksy" God! He knows where "all the bodies are buried!")
To: Terry Mross
Not worthless, just worth less.
8 posted on
12/06/2017 6:02:46 AM PST by
coon2000
(Give me Liberty or give me death)
To: Terry Mross
So what is wrong with affordable gold being widely used?
10 posted on
12/06/2017 6:05:41 AM PST by
hoosierham
(Freedom isn't free)
To: Terry Mross
Gold is a better electrical and thermal conductor than copper. Big chunks of it might be, you know, handy, in solar orbit.
Just saying...
17 posted on
12/06/2017 6:20:24 AM PST by
jonascord
(First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
To: Terry Mross
If the cost to get it is figured into the equation it might actually not be worth doing it. More to produce than it is worth and therefore not worth doing. Unless, of course you want government to intervene into a commodity market to show those stupid gold bugs who’s boss....
Gold will always be valuable. Perhaps not always at the level it currently is, but it is a very useful metal.
24 posted on
12/06/2017 6:42:39 AM PST by
ExpatGator
(I hate Illinois Nazis!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson