New England Journal of Medicine published just that 20 years ago. They were EXCORIATED. Had to do with abortions in one’s 20’s being more likely to get cancer in their 40’s. Made simple sense. Pregnancy is good for a woman’s health. Should all women bring one child into the world and not go through with that procedure? Conclusion: yes.
I think this has been known for a long time. But we’re not supposed to talk about it.
Abortion too. There is a price to be paid.
WHO WERE IN THE CONTROL GROUP?????
Where did they find an equal number of women who had NEVER been on chemical birth control?????
13/100,000 = 0.013%
“...The study, funded by pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk Foundation, has its limitations: according to the researchers, it didn’t account for factors such as breast-feeding, exercise, weight, obesity, and alcohol consumption, all of which research has found affect breast cancer in some way...”
This is critical to understanding the limitation of this study’s conclusion.
Artificially flooding the body with hormones has a deleterious effect.
Not nice to fool with the politically correct narrative, but it is much worse to fool with mother nature. Also verboten to mention that women who have had abortions have a higher incidence of breast carcinoma and that women who use alcohol or intoxicating drugs early in pregnancy are more likely to have autistic or brain damaged children.
This has been known for decades.