So you’d rather lose with Moore and have a Democrat voting in that seat for the next 3?
Moore was a terrible candidate. I was correct.
Any candidate that isn’t uniparty approved is automatically a ‘terrible candidate’.
You’re not much of a ‘tea party terrorist’ are you?
Moore was collateral damage.
The war was between the uniparty and uppity peasants who want to actually vote their own candidates.
It was NO coincidence that these charges, FORTY YEARS OLD, came out the day AFTER the ballots were printed. Amazingly ALL these women suddenly remembered the ‘abuse’ after having failed to do so during all Moore’s statewide races over the past 20+ years. AMAZING I tell you.
Again....and, please pay close attention....I’d rather NOT have RINOs/GOPe like McConnell, Romney, Tim Scott, Ari Fliescher, et al meddling in a state race.
Moore won the primary, fair and square. Moore was up in the polls, just until this past weekend. Hmmm.
Sounds like it is YOU who’d rather lose to the RINOs/Dims/establishment, than to have a conservative in that seat.
Is that you, Mitch??
Your ad hominem, straw man BS isn’t working, here. No Sale.