Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Reveal Interstellar Object ‘Oumuamua’ Has Organic Shell
Breitbart ^ | 12-20-2017 | Nate Church

Posted on 12/20/2017 6:44:36 AM PST by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
"To consider the Earth as the only populated world in infinite space is as absurd as to assert that in an entire field of millet, only one grain will grow." -- Metrodorus, 4th c BC Greek philosopher
"Heaven and earth are large, yet in the whole of space they are but as a small grain of rice. How unreasonable it would be to suppose that, besides the heaven and earth which we can see, there are no other heavens and no other earths." -- Teng Mu, 13th c AD Chinese philosopher
"But I am not really willing to accept your premise, because it may well be that the means of communications they have are of a kind that we do not know how to receive, and that they would not have the means of communicating with sufficiently powerful radio or optical signals. That is something which, technologically, is too difficult for them but they would have some other means we would not recognize." -- Thomas J. Gold, 'Communication with Extraterrestial Intelligence' (Sagan, ed)

61 posted on 12/20/2017 9:30:42 AM PST by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PIF

Didn’t it pass pretty close to the sun???


62 posted on 12/20/2017 9:35:41 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jettester
My dog’s turds get “shells” on the them after being outside for awhile

Up here (Southeast Alaska) we pick up after our dogs, wrap the turds in little plastic bags and ship them to Seattle...

Yes. I'm serious.

63 posted on 12/20/2017 9:37:33 AM PST by Chuckster ("Them Rag Heads just ain't rational" Curly Bartley 1973)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bar sin·is·ter

Zindi?


64 posted on 12/20/2017 10:12:20 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bar sin·is·ter

Zindi?


65 posted on 12/20/2017 10:12:20 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62; blam

The other angle was discussed in the postwar years — planting a probe on such an object would give our technology a nice boost out of the Solar System in a timeframe we can’t manage with available propulsion.


66 posted on 12/20/2017 10:33:04 AM PST by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

If we can land on it, then we’ve already boosted to the object’s velocity. Perhaps it would give us a source for raw materials, maybe even rocket fuel.

According to Wiki, some now believe that multiple interstellar objects pass through the Solar System every year. If that’s the case, then we should be able to land on one eventually.


67 posted on 12/20/2017 10:42:49 AM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: blam

Thanks, I mean the stuff about an ‘organic shell’


68 posted on 12/20/2017 11:14:26 AM PST by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, deport all illegals, abolish the DEA, IRS and ATF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

No, not close enough to the sun account for speed increase - it is just assumed it must have passed by a large body, but its path as calculated does not show anything ... unless it changed course ...


69 posted on 12/20/2017 12:21:53 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

We only have to match its velociity for a short time, iow, a short burn — but would have to be waiting in its path, which means we’d need either a bunch of probes waiting around for such an event, or a better observational system, perhaps in solar orbit out by Neptune.


70 posted on 12/20/2017 12:53:56 PM PST by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Chuckster
"Up here (Southeast Alaska) we pick up after our dogs, wrap the turds in little plastic bags and ship them to Seattle..."

So you're a Starbucks supplier?

71 posted on 12/20/2017 12:56:29 PM PST by bar sin·is·ter (Climate Scientology - another example of science fiction morphing into a religious cult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: blam
The first high-resolution images are just starting to come in:

They have decided to rename the mysterious object "Monica-2017BJC"

72 posted on 12/20/2017 1:09:44 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

This thing comes from outside the solar system. The real concern should be to ask if it is the first rock of a huge meteor storm coming towards us.


73 posted on 12/20/2017 1:42:48 PM PST by aimhigh (1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF

“No, not close enough to the sun account for speed increase...”

Passing inside the orbit of Mercury is not close enough for a gravity assist from the sun?


74 posted on 12/20/2017 3:12:00 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Just going by what the astronomer said.


75 posted on 12/20/2017 3:26:42 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: bar sin·is·ter
So you're a Starbucks supplier?

I guess the secret's out...

76 posted on 12/20/2017 4:57:13 PM PST by Chuckster ("Them Rag Heads just ain't rational" Curly Bartley 1973)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: blam

Obviously a General Products hull.


77 posted on 12/20/2017 7:55:13 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
So they are without equivocation saying that this space object is covered with once living matter? They can't be this stupid, can they?:

ogan·ic

ADJECTIVE

of, relating to, or derived from living matter:

78 posted on 12/20/2017 8:22:23 PM PST by Bellflower (Who dares believe Jesus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Who is “the astronomer” you’re talking about?


79 posted on 12/21/2017 7:44:47 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: blam

Thanks for posting.


80 posted on 12/21/2017 1:19:56 PM PST by GOPJ (EVERY hellhole in the world is run by self appointed 'elites'...think about THAT FBI traitors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson