Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mywholebodyisaweapon

The statistic they are th about has been this way for several years.


10 posted on 12/24/2017 3:52:01 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brilliant

Exactly! And it could be the way it is now for a very long time. Here’s hoping!


14 posted on 12/24/2017 3:54:18 PM PST by mywholebodyisaweapon (Thank God for President Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Brilliant

The strange thing is that the two year vs. ten year spread can bounce around all it likes, but doesn’t correlate at all to a coming recession.

I think it may be because the Fed parks so many funds in the one year treasuries, but am not sure. In 1991, I did an exhaustive study using daily data since WWII. NONE of the other yield spreads had the perfect record of the one-year vs. ten-year CMT yields. Of course, it COULD some day go south, but hasn’t yet. I’ve been able to predict three of the last three recessions without false signals using that particular spread. My students think I know something special. Not really, most good economists know about the spread and its predictive power. Besides, I left my portfolios unchanged from 2006 to 2008 even though I knew were going into a recession. When I tell them that, they realize that I am an idiot, not a genius, after all.

But it’s always a little amusing, and little bit annoying, when some analyst with any kind of name recognition suddenly discovers yield curves.


24 posted on 12/24/2017 4:07:36 PM PST by mywholebodyisaweapon (Thank God for President Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson