Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GoldenState_Rose

Somebody finances his movies which are pricy and not cash earners indeed.
I agree they are arty but don’t like overall.
That and Leviathan are nothing but a revival of late 1980s dark ‘chernukha’ genre.
I don’t want to go to a cinema and spend money to look into government corruption and family problems presented in a way to blame me as part of society for some evils. Also both movies has sinsible anti-Christian massage betraying it as a depressive leftist propaganda.

New York Times on the other hand seems to love Zvyagintsev work a lot.
I suspect for their propaganda ‘Leviathan’ and ‘Loveless’ are a kind of that ‘Grapes of Wrath’ were for Pravda in USSR.


22 posted on 01/01/2018 11:10:53 PM PST by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: NorseViking

Agreed. I even liked government-approved “Stalingrad” by Bondarchuk better than “Leviathan” or “Loveless” (just saw it)...and Elena was also in the same vein. Haven’t seen “The Return”...

My favorite Russian film is “Andrei Rublev” by Tarkovsky.

Have you seen....VIKING? :)


23 posted on 01/01/2018 11:21:09 PM PST by GoldenState_Rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson