Replies

That's exactly right. The "global warming" scientists have absolutely no idea what they are talking about when they try to predict man-made warming. They can't even predict the amount of snow we will get while the event is in progress!

I woke up this morning with a 4-6 inch forecast in my area and on that basis, I was planning to travelling to my Manhattan office. I then looked outside and realized that the forecast was going to be dead wrong. So I stayed home. And glad I did because we got well over a foot and my area here in Southern Connecticut is paralyzed. Eventually the upgraded the forecast to 8-14 inches but that was after most of the snow had already fallen.

And yet they want us to give billions of dollars to "stop" global warming? Even if global warming was actually true, how do they propose to stop it? What will those billions of dollars be used for?

they upgraded the forecast to 8-14 inches but that was after most of the snow had already fallen.

Is an after-the-fact "forecast" actually a "backcast"? On the bright side, their backcasts are never wrong.

Actually, even that isn't true with liberals. Election Night 2016, 9 PM. "Our models predict that Hillary Clinton has a 98% chance of being the next President of the United States."