Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: miss marmelstein

And the Tudors destroyed the evidence that supported Parliament’s move to make Richard king.

I have to admit a certain fascination with Richard III - he may be the most maligned monarch in British history.


40 posted on 01/28/2018 11:10:23 AM PST by independentmind (Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: independentmind

See Titulus Regius.


41 posted on 01/28/2018 11:14:02 AM PST by independentmind (Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: independentmind

Yes, they destroyed Titulus Regius. Luckily, one showed up a couple of centuries later and it laid out the reasons why they passed over the young Edward.

He was badly maligned. In his short time on the throne, he was a good king. Especially for the commoners.


45 posted on 01/28/2018 11:23:56 AM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: independentmind

Josephine Tey wrote a historical mystery about Richard with the premise that history is written by the victors. (The Tudors with Shakespeare’s help)

Tey’s “The Daughter of Time” really supports your “he may be the most maligned monarch in British history.” And I agree!

IIRC they found his grave a couple years ago under a parking lot and discovered he wasn’t even a hunchedback!


94 posted on 01/28/2018 7:40:04 PM PST by lizma2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson