Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DUMBGRUNT

There is a little problem: land is expensive, frequently land drives the price, not the cost of building a house.

Nevertheless, they could maybe build many of these homes close to each other, several on one lot, to make them less expensive.


18 posted on 03/12/2018 9:26:16 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Innovative

Of course, people could just rent an apartment.


19 posted on 03/12/2018 9:27:50 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative; All

There is a little problem: land is expensive, frequently land drives the price, not the cost of building a house.


Land, zoning requirements, and building codes. Physically, houses are not expensive.

It is all the legal requirements and the cost of the land that make them expensive.

This technique reduces the physical cost a little, but why would you put a $4,000 house on a $40,000 lot?


22 posted on 03/12/2018 9:37:51 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson