Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

It seems the moon could have formed like the Earth formed. The Moon could have aggregated into what it is and gotten close enough for Earth’s gravity to capture it. I don’t understand why a grand collision had to necessarily take place to produce the Moon.


43 posted on 03/18/2018 10:04:51 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk
...It seems the moon could have formed like the Earth formed. The Moon could have aggregated into what it is and gotten close enough for Earth’s gravity to capture it. I don’t understand why a grand collision had to necessarily take place to produce the Moon.

The problem is that two independent bodies can not "capture" each other. There is too much momentum and kinetic energy. Unless there is a collision, they will inevitably separate, essentially fly right past each other. If there is a third body, under exactly the right conditions, it may gain momentum and allow two bodies to be mutually captured, but this is very improbable.

OTOH, the earth-moon system is essentially a binary planet. Stand back and look at the whole forest instead of the individual trees. Binary stars are well known and actually very common. Why the earth-moon system could not form by a variation on the same mechanisms that form binary stars is the question we should be asking.

47 posted on 03/19/2018 12:19:45 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk; CurlyDave
Some selections from the lunarorigin keyword, out of the FRchives:

49 posted on 03/19/2018 6:57:51 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson