Posted on 04/03/2018 7:15:59 AM PDT by C19fan
A model who charged up to $500 (£350) for a date has found love with an older 'nerdy' code analyst - after she stopped making him pay to take her out.
Emily Kearns, 27, from Downtown Indianapolis, explained how she started using 'sugar daddy' website WhatsYourPrice, which sees men paying attractive women on dates, to get over a relationship.
She said she never expected to fall for coding analyst and developer, Noah McCollam, 41, who she initially described as looking like a 'nerd' and 'not very photogenic'.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Hey you are tall at the bank. That’s what my ex boyfriend used to jokingly tell people. :-)
Come on Laz, you’d hit it.
"date"... meaning that she put out if she felt like it, and the guys were left to hope to get her to "feel like it" (and alcohol may be involved in lubricating that wheel)...
27, with a 7 year old... meaning a single mom with her desirable traits on the wane, needing a support system fast since she never provided one for herself, and she was stupid enough to choose a baby-daddy who also couldn't or wouldn't provide one for his own son...
Hopefully she sincerely sees the older gent as her salvation, and treats him well for a happy lifetime together... but far too often, once the hooks are in, these girls tend to go downhill fast, and seem to relish fouling their own nest, because they are bitter at the results of their own poor choices in life, and happily take it out on the fool who finally fell for their line of BS.
The Daily Mail, the worst-edited rag on two continents, can’t even get the guy’s age to match in the headline and the story. How do you get 41 or 49? They’re at opposite ends of the keyboard.
Gotta admire the honesty of the name “Whats Your Price”, though.
Looks like there should be a hook in that mouth!
Expect him to have an “accident” after he takes out a million dollar life insurance policy with his wife as the beneficiary. It happens fairly frequently.
“She loves the big bulge in my pants.” (patting wallet in back pocket)
Just like the "up to $500" line, the "model" tag simply means that she posed once for some local photographer to take pics of her with her clothes on, and she was told that the pics might get used in a magazine someday. Papers may or may not have been signed, but she will carry the title of "model" to her grave because she posed for pics once that weren't selfies, and actual klieg lights and a backdrop might have been used. She DIDN'T have to have sex for those pics, therefore they're "quality, professional work", and thus she earned that title.
Charging $500 for a date. And she has charged for many dates. Sorry, I am drawing the wrong conclusion.
For $500 a date she better be painting my house while she’s at it
Choosing a nerd is probably a better move.
We tend to be more loyal and much less demanding.
It probably won’t last but heck they are having fun.
Do not accept a trip to Dubai lol.It's become a cottage industry for Hollywood starlets and New York supermodels.
Supposedly, many of the #metoo crowd have supplemented their income via trips to Dubai. Or spending their summer vacations as "yacht girls".
Of course I would.
But I wouldn't pay 500 for it.
When her hypergamy opportunity exceeded her cash value, she bought. Not a big surprise.
Just texted that to my 16 year old son!
Your summary is right on point.
I am constantly astonished at this generation of people who ardently reject God and conservative values and appear eagerly willing to accept a helter skelter life as the natural substitute.
“Mother of one”. Somebody already damaged this with a womb turd and is she is looking for another loser to rear it. Like others here have commented, she owes her dates money.
The yacht will have at least one room covered entirely with plastic...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.