Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Buckeye McFrog

Indeed. By and large most people’s diet back then sucked compared to ours. Most people were still eating what was available by the season and health regulation was virtually non-existent compared to 2018 (or even 1958). Nice clothes and better manners aside, life was hard and often short back then.


20 posted on 04/09/2018 2:26:33 PM PDT by NRx (A man of integrity passes his father's civilization to his son, without selling it off to strangers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: NRx

I think it depended where you were. Most of the country was agricultural, and people generally ate pretty healthily, if they ate less varied or “fancy” diets.

My grandmother would have been 21 years old when this film was made, left largely orphaned and ill-cared for from the age of 12, married at 16, and having borne three children. She lived to be 94 despite childhood malaria and one pregnancy/childbirth that almost killed her and affected her for life.

But the work to live back then for everyone involved a lot of physical exercise that people don’t get now. Just running a household was enormously different for women, in terms of sheer physical labor. While that could be detrimental depending on economic status, in many cases it was probably healthy and strengthening.

(And I would suggest that mental/emotional health was generally superior.)


29 posted on 04/09/2018 3:24:29 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

I wonder how many of those men wound up fighting and dying in WWI?


44 posted on 04/09/2018 9:16:16 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson