by now, there should have been some action on Clinton/DNC funding of the Steele dossier used to get a FISA warrant on multiple occasions, in an effort to stop Donald Trump becoming President, and then in order to try to destroy his Presidency.
28 Apr: Craig Murray: Probable Western Responsibility for Skripal Poisoning
UPDATE: Stupidly I had forgotten this vital confirmation from Channel 4 News (serial rebel Alex Thomson) of the D Notice in place on mention of Pablo Miller.
TWEET: Alex Thomson Ch4: About the only decisive public move by the authorities has been to censor MSM via a D Notice last week from fully identifying Mr Skripal’s MI6 handler living nearby...
12 Mar 2018
Back then I did not realise what I now know, that the person being protected was Pablo Miller, colleague in both MI6 then Orbis Intelligence of Christopher Steele, author of the fabrications of the Trump/Russia golden shower dossier. That the government’s very first act on the poisoning was to ban all media mention of Pablo Miller makes it extremely probable that this whole incident is related to the Trump dossier and that Skripal had worked on it, as I immediately suspected. The most probable cause is that Skripal – who you should remember had traded the names of Russian agents to Britain for cash – had worked on the dossier with Miller but was threatening to expose its lies for cash.
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/04/probable-western-responsibility-for-skripal-poisoning/comment-page-6/#comments
Twitter: Alex Thomson, Chief Correspondent and Presenter, Channel 4 News.: TWEET: 12 Mar 2018: About the only decisive public move by the authorities has been to censor MSM via a D Notice last week from fully identifying Mr Skripal’s MI6 handler living nearby...
https://twitter.com/alextomo/status/973125120414928897
Correct me if I’m wrong. The FBI/DoJ went to the FISA Court at least 4 times using the DNC/Hillary/Steele Pee-Pee Paper as a basis of the FISA warrant request to spy on political opponents. That means they had 4 occasions to explain to the court (not by a hidden footnote here and there) that the Pee-Pee Paper Dossier was funded by political operatives. Further, they failed to inform the court that the Pee-Pee Dossier was piped through the Coie law firm to avoid campaign finance laws and FEC rules. How many crimes were committed in this little gambit?