Interesting when one demands “proof” when their own claims and assertions also have no proof! Evolution as now taught is devoid of proof... it consist solely of various speculations, antidotes and at its root bold proclamations. Evolution can’t prove how the first cell emerged, how DNA happened or how the origin of the sexes occurred. We just know it did!
One of the #RustyIronies in the current “debate” is the evolutionist will admit they don’t know how life began... but with certitude and arrogance, declare how it didn’t... an Intelligent Creator. If it were science, its adherents would not go apoplectic when questioned… then demand opposing views be silenced! That ain’t science, its dogma and ideology.
“Evolution can’t prove how the first cell emerged, how DNA happened or how the origin of the sexes occurred. We just know it did!”
“Proof” to an evolutionist means stating the conclusion you desire first, then finding a way to make a semantic argument that appears to show a possible way that conclusion might be true, while ignoring any arguments that might show it to be false.
Since I made no claim or assertion, how can I argue?
Evolution can’t prove how the first cell emerged,
I didn't know that was one of the things demanded of evolution.