[[Proof to an evolutionist means stating the conclusion you desire first, then finding a way to make a semantic argument that appears to show a possible way that conclusion might be true, while ignoring any arguments that might show it to be false.]]
Well put- worth repeating because that is exactly what happens- I might add that they also attack the character of anyone who puts up possible counterarguments to their hypothesis- calling them unscientific/ psuedoscientists- and all manner of derogatory names- For many- this amounts to ‘scientific debate’
But no Freeper would do that another Freeper, right?
I remember the CreVo threads well.