Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Drew68

I believe someone in her family killed her accidentally. I have read most of the books. It was unreal how Patsy and her husband called many of their friends to come over after getting the randsome note. The randsome note was written on a pad in their house. The friends were all over the house contaminating it. Who does that when the note said do not contact police? So they invite their friends over as well as call the police?

That room was very well hidden and you had to know the house very well to find the room. The pineapple bowl with Patsy’s fingerprints on it. No footprints were found outside in the snow. John went directly to the hidden room with his neighbor friend, lifted JOn Benet, carried her upstairs, peeled off the tape on her mouth then threw a blanket on her contaminating her body.

The randsome amount was exact amount of John’s bonus 118K.

The police were not allowed to question Burke for several days. He was promptly removed from the home and taken to a friends house.

Yes police made mistakes but it was started by Ramsey’s letting their friends in their home.

If that would have been me, I would have called police only. Preserving evidence is vital.

It was like they wanted to throw people off the trail on purpose.

I think Burke did it and they covered for their remaining child.

The grand jury say all the evidence and came back with yes, to convict both John and Patsy but the prosecutor over ruled them and didn’t charge them. Why?


25 posted on 06/02/2018 4:44:07 PM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Engedi
I think Burke did it and they covered for their remaining child.

Except DNA evidence cleared all family members.

Criminal profiler John Edward Douglas, who probably knows more about serial killers than anyone else in the world, has always maintained that it was an intruder who killed JonBenet. He would write a best-selling book about it. I believe him.


30 posted on 06/02/2018 4:55:36 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Engedi

“The grand jury say all the evidence and came back with yes, to convict both John and Patsy but the prosecutor over ruled them and didn’t charge them. “

more of your bullshit.

grand jury never recommended indictment for murder:

“A grand jury was convened beginning September 15, 1998 to consider indicting the Ramseys for charges relating to the case. In 1999, the grand jury returned a true bill to charge the Ramseys with placing the child at risk in a way that led to her death and with obstructing an investigation of murder, based on the probable cause standard applied in such grand jury proceedings, but Boulder County District Attorney Alex Hunter did not prosecute them because he did not believe that he could meet the higher standard of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which is required for a criminal conviction.

Mary Lacy, the next Boulder County District Attorney, took over the investigation from the police on December 26, 2002. In April 2003, she agreed with a federal judge who sat on a 2002 libel case that evidence in the suit is “more consistent with a theory that an intruder murdered JonBenét than it was with a theory that Mrs. Ramsey did”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_JonBen%C3%A9t_Ramsey#9-1-1_call_and_initial_search_for_the_child


35 posted on 06/02/2018 5:07:44 PM PDT by catnipman ((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson