Here again is the Cindy Sheehan quote I posted on that thread where you said she was "absolutely correct" in regards to GW Bush...
Posted on 06/02/2018 8:20:44 PM PDT by Impala64ssa
You're really nuts, aren't you. This stuff may be even weirder than that stuff you posted on that other thread in support of communist Cindy Sheehan. Don't know why you're posting this left-wing crap on FR.
From the Wall Street Journal
NOVEMBER 24, 2007
Oswald was a dedicated communist who had defected to the Soviet Union in 1959 out of disgust with American capitalism. After becoming disillusioned with Soviet life, he returned to the U.S. in 1962. In early 1963, he bought a scoped rifle through the mail and soon used it to fire a shot (which missed) at retired general Edwin Walker, the head of the John Birch Society in Dallas. In the summer of 1963, Oswald was active in street demonstrations in support of Castro. In September 1963, he visited the Soviet and Cuban embassies in Mexico City seeking a travel visa that would allow him to travel to Cuba.
Oswald was among the radicals of the time who saw Third World revolutionaries like Castro as the wave of the communist future. He was well aware of Kennedy’s efforts to overthrow Castro’s regime. As a Senate investigative committee suggested in 1975, Oswald shot Kennedy to interrupt his administration’s plans to assassinate Castro or to overthrow his regime in Cuba.
Ignoring Oswald’s communist links, journalists and political leaders quickly claimed the president was a martyr to civil rights. Earl Warren said that Kennedy had “suffered martyrdom as a result of the hatred and bitterness that has been injected into the life of our nation by bigots.” Martin Luther King said the assassination had to be viewed against the backdrop of violence against civil rights marchers in the South. James Reston wrote in the New York Times that “something in the nation itself, some strain of madness and violence, had destroyed the highest symbol of law and order.”
The consensus opinion was that Kennedy was a victim of hate and bigotry, a casualty of his support for civil rights. The Cold War and Kennedy’s ongoing feud with Castro were rarely mentioned as factors behind the assassination. The reasons? Mrs. Kennedy wanted her husband remembered as a modern-day Abraham Lincoln. Lyndon Johnson feared complicating relations with the Soviet Union. Liberals feared a replay of the McCarthy period, when the Wisconsin senator inflamed public opinion about fears of domestic communism.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119586848318702756.html
You need to brush up on your history.
Crawford was working for Pepsi and so was Nixon and so was their boss (I think his name was Kendall). Pepsi had big time Cuban sugar interests.
Don’t tell me you didn’t know Nixon’s patron since his Whittier days was Prescott Bush?
And BushRINOs are liberals... and that’s the problem with RINOs like you.
P.S. I sure sniffed out a RoveRINO in you. But here’s a question for ya.
Who’s more liberal? Someone who agrees with Cindy Sheehan on one point, her bottom-line assessment on RINO Bush?
Or a supposed Christian and Conservative former President who calls Bill Clinton his “brother by another mother” while they scheme and scam money on their Haiti “charity” together?
Now go do your homework and quit trolling me. Thanks.
Here again is the Cindy Sheehan quote I posted on that thread where you said she was "absolutely correct" in regards to GW Bush...
And here's another one, because you must certainly be NeverTrump as well:
Stupid response, as I expected from you.
Oh, I forgot to mention that since Bush invaded, almost 1 million Christians have been genocided in Iraq.
If you study the origins of the word “terrorism” it stems from Vladimir Lenin and his demonized Bolshevik revolution ... against Judeo Christianity.
As I mentioned on that other thread I was no real fan of GW Bush. But I don’t side with the communist left in saying he or the US in general is/are terrorists. And that dictator Chavez was to be admired for his “standing up” to us.
Which is exactly why I am hammering Bush to you, to get you past the common way we have excused his behavior.
The letters G O P do not mean he is not also a liberal RINO who backs left wing causes (Bush funded Planned Parenthood for eight full years) and funds terrorism.
Thus the definition of the Uniparty, (evil personified).
This is NOT a left vs right world anymore. It’s us versus Anti-God Globalists of the Uniparty.
you ALWAYS come up with the best pix...
JFK library fire and Boston Marathon bombing: Coincidence OR Conspiracy?
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/15/jfk-library-explosion-boston-bombing_n_3087446.html
After reviewing this story and a few others, it appears to me it is most likely a coincidence. Just because the word “appears” was used by me does not make it true.
1. The JFK library was mostly damaged by smoke
2. There were no injuries at the JFK library
One mention in that story was HVAC equipment as the initiator of that event but I did not see confirmation elsewhere if that was true. It was also hypothesized it could have been a bomb.
We’ll know the truth if any “new” or altered documents magically appear... but it was initially reported on social media to be part of the attack/event.
That’s a picture I’ve never seen before. Looks like someone holding their head in the middle one. Definitely not the president’s limo...guy in the rear car is sitting pretty casual....
The 1961 and 1962 Lincoln Continentals were both designed by Elwood Engel, who replaced noted Chrysler designer Virgil Exner in 1961. Engel also designed my 1964 Plymouth Fury, by the way. You can compare the Grills. They look much the same.
Oswald was a patsy, set up by the secret folks in the SEEEE-EYE- AYE!
Who the shooters actually were has become a secondary issue, IMHO. Who pulled the trigger(s) has become minor to the gist of the assassination of a sitting president. This is especially apparent when it is known that evidence, including eye-witness accounts has been falsified or tampered with to bury the truth. Too much valuable information has been suppressed for far too long.
A reasonable man is left to presume the Agency has been hiding a great deal from the public. If they were not the puppet-masters of the entire bloody show then they must have been incredibly stupid and/or negligent, at best.
In descending order of importance:
1. Who ordered Kennedy’s death?
2. Who conspired to plan the hit?
3. Who collaborated to hide the truth?
4. Who did they utilize to kill the president?
a. Existing Agents
b. Mob hit-men
c. Cubans hell-bent on retaliation
d. Nut-bags lone-wolf haters
e. Russian double agents
f. It doesn’t matter- they planned it; they own it.
I always wondered if Virgil Exner was related to JFK’s “alleged” mistress Judith Exner?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.