Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Calvin Locke
But yes, overall, the combat deployments were fairly low in Europe. Throw in the 2x maintenance and fuel requirements, and availability of other a/c... it didn't bring anything better to the table in Europe.

The P-38's more complicated logistics requiring larger ground crews and spare parts was definitely a strike against it. However, those citing poor air performance over Europe must explain why that was the plane's fault when it had such a stellar air performance record in the Pacific including cold weather flying over the Northern Pacific from bases in Alaska and the Aleutians.

When discussing which plane was best, a crucial point often left out by P-38 detractors is that initial squadrons of P-38s send to Europe for bomber escort duty were flown by inexperienced pilots who had to tangle with Germany's best combat pilots. The P-51 came along after the cream of Germany's best fighter pilots were dead.

75 posted on 06/15/2018 8:54:13 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: fso301
That's another thing. The Germans had concentrated AAA. The P-38 was a big target, comparatively speaking.

As a fighter over the Pacific, there was a lot less ground fire to contend with.

85 posted on 06/15/2018 9:24:49 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson