Posted on 06/26/2018 1:52:08 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
I’m guessing she gets 500K for her hate America decision and 500K to publicly protest the decision.
When I become dictator I will not allow these judges to pretend that they are President.
Guess Sonya’s clerk couldn’t find the federal statute which gives, in plain language, exclusive power to the president to decide who gets to come into the country.
People have been brainwashed to believe that we have some obligation to allow entry into the United States, which is asinine.
It was Cultural Marxism that landed Sotomayor in the court to protect those of her Latino identity from being oppressed. It was setting the stage for the flood of illegals that Zer0 and, later Hillary, would use to change the culture of America into a totalitarian tribalist state ruled by an elite class. Such tribalistic systems are what we see in those failed nations south of our border.
Based on her ignorant reasoning, then every politician who runs for office and gets elected could be sued by an aggrieved constituency because of their political rhetoric.
I disagree. I think she could turn down beds in a Motel.
Yup. Ginsburg, aged 85, already looks like a corpse and Breyer is 79. So The Wise Latina will soon be writing her 7-2 dissents.
Amen!
Sonia, what part of the explicit wording of the constitution on this subject makes your stupid opinion about why the duly elected President made a decision matter? Or are you just another feckless hunt hat wearing imbecile?
Has anyone verified she’s in the country legally?
Irrelevant. What does the Constitution say?
Er, remember, Wise Latina? The Constitution?
No...it was Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kaganand Sotomayer
Yup. Ginsburg, aged 85, already looks like a corpse and Breyer is 79. So The Wise Latina will soon be writing her 7-2 dissents.
—
Can’t come soon enough.
Her diabetes acting up? Quick someone give her a lollipop!
Not Kennedy in dissent, it was Breyer.
“Trump’s travel ban could result in Muslim immigration to the US to be reduced by as much as 21%.”
That’s all?
So, it was Sotomayor, Kagan, Ginsburg, and Kennedy in dissent?
______________________________________________________________
Breyer was the 4th, not Kennedy.
So this idiot thinks campaign rhetoric should be used to determine what a EO means rather then what the EO actual says. What f’n moron apparently she does see the chaos this argument invites.
Wise Latina, my ass.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.