Seems like that you’d end up with a lot of unemployed folks with some kind of ‘stand-issue’. And if there’s eight years of Trumpism, and maybe another eight of near-Trumpism...can a guy afford to be unemployed for sixteen years?
This is good news.
Business concerns that discriminate against classes of customers lose business.
But, it is basic freedom of association for business owners to be able to pick and choose customers.
We need the Supreme Court to reaffirm that basic human right.
“...can a guy afford to be unemployed for sixteen years?”
You used to be able to collect Unemployment for seemingly the entire EIGHT YEARS under 0bama; I seem to remember it being one of Nancy Pelosi’s ideas of an economic ‘stimulus.’
*SNORT*
Glad to see these LOSERS getting the attention they deserve. Hard to believe this guy lost his job in Canada, though. Once PDJT gets rolling on fixing ‘that giant sucking sound’ known as NAFTA, they’ll be liking us even less. ;)
I sure hope that none of these firings lead to those ‘employees’ being able to collect UNEMPLOYMENT payments.