Posted on 07/08/2018 6:06:49 PM PDT by MountainWalker
This guy is followed by Cernovich, Posobiec and James Woods. I know at least Cern and Posobiec are pretty well connected with the Trump Admin, so I think this is somewhat solid. We'll know for sure in 24h.
Gawd, you're not just an a-hole, you're ignorant as well. McConnell, in a rare moment of finding his spine, lowered the confirmation threshhold to 51 for Gorsuch.
I agree with you. A possible Trump curve ball.
If Trump wants to put elected dems in states that he carried in electoral hell than Amy Barrett is a great pick.
Even better is she is a textulist just like Scilia. She will make a great Judge. She was the only one with enough guts to tell Congress bad law should be over turned.
The Marxist are going to go bat s##t crazy if she if the nominee. The big ugly will be on full display and the base will be fired up big time. The Rats get no free lunch if Trump nominate Amy Barrett.
If true, this seems to be an excellent choice.
If not, I hope she’s selected down the road.
I’m not belittling a woman for having too many kids. I myself am one of twelve. But kids can become targets of threats if you know what I mean.
Oh, puh-leeze. Under your viewpoint, we should only nominated childless adults to SCOTUS. That’s absurd.
She seems to be one of the best on the list. You never fully know with a Supreme Court choice, but you have indications, and all of her indications are good.
This argument that she shouldn’t be picked because of Sandra Day O’Connor just plain doesn’t hold water.
Top of her class as an undergrad
Top of he class at ND law school
Recommended by every prof at her law school both liberal and conservative
Recommended by every one that clerked with her at the SC and both liberals and conservative.
Twice voted best proffessor at ND by the students of ND.
I'm pretty sure she knows what "shall not be infringed" means
We just won a bunch of major decisions 5-4. How much were you thinking about the religions of the majority then?
And those signs always sprouted in the same spots where Hillary signs were a few weeks beforehand. I'm sure that was just a coincidence.
Well, I guess if you had your way back in the Bush the Elder years, we should have never nominated Clarence Thomas since Thurgood Marshall was such a hardcore lib. CAN WE PLEASE EXAMINE THE CONTENT OF HER CHARACTER?
Laura Ingraham has three adopted children from other countries; would that disqualify her?
You might try studying U.S. civics.
Like many actual Catholics, I am sure she knows enough to ignore most of what this Pope says.
Like they went after JFK.
My husband and I found that out when we were researching adoption.
We ended up adopting a 5-year-old from a Russian orphanage because
(1) We didn't have to go through our County and State Foster System as precondition to adoption --- which we couldn't stomach.
(2) Adopting from Russia, there was no possibility of a birthmother or birthfather making a surprise appearance and trying to bollix things up with some belated legal complication.
(3) There was no question of "open adoption" -- the requirement to be open to involving the birthmother in terms of identifying contact information or ongoing relationship, if she wants that.
Many people don't realize that adoption in the US can be tied up in a hundred legal and regulatory knots.
Not only that: I'm amazed at the people who can't distinguish between cheap, photo-op, hypocritical "virtue-signalling," and genuine "virtue", which is where you engage quietly and sincerely, act generously, and pay up personally.
It’s like saying Rachel Maddow is bad, so Laura Ingraham shouldn’t have a show.
Senator Feinstein, who could have guessed you post on Free Republic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.