Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SuperLuminal

Then hopefully your gut is way more informed about this nominee than mine. I’m just going with the fact the chances of a female judge being truly strict constructionist conservative are extremely remote. How many female judges are going to understand what “shall not be infringed” means?


158 posted on 07/08/2018 7:28:42 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: precisionshootist
How many female judges are going to understand what “shall not be infringed” means?

Top of her class as an undergrad
Top of he class at ND law school
Recommended by every prof at her law school both liberal and conservative
Recommended by every one that clerked with her at the SC and both liberals and conservative.
Twice voted best proffessor at ND by the students of ND.

I'm pretty sure she knows what "shall not be infringed" means

169 posted on 07/08/2018 7:40:55 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: precisionshootist
Then hopefully your gut is way more informed about this nominee than mine. I’m just going with the fact the chances of a female judge being truly strict constructionist conservative are extremely remote

Well, I guess if you had your way back in the Bush the Elder years, we should have never nominated Clarence Thomas since Thurgood Marshall was such a hardcore lib. CAN WE PLEASE EXAMINE THE CONTENT OF HER CHARACTER?

173 posted on 07/08/2018 7:43:44 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson