Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: precisionshootist
Wow way to many recommendations to even have a chance of knowing what that means. She’s a lib, bet on it. The odds that she’s not lib are astronomical.

Congratulations on the dumbest post yet on this thread. Ignore the accolades. She's a she, therefore she must be a liberal. Do you realize you just insulted all the fine women conservatives on this site, as well as the wives of the conservative men? This kind of crap is pathetic.

197 posted on 07/08/2018 8:07:50 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
Congratulations on the dumbest post yet on this thread. Ignore the accolades. She's a she, therefore she must be a liberal. Do you realize you just insulted all the fine women conservatives on this site, as well as the wives of the conservative men? This kind of crap is pathetic. "

Nope, my post about her accolades has nothing to do with being a women or not. You need to reread my post.

" Wow way to many recommendations to even have a chance of knowing what that means. She’s a lib, bet on it. The odds that she’s not lib are astronomical.

The recommendations and accolades by law professors is the problem. That should by default be viewed as a negative until proven otherwise.

As far as being a women as a disqualification then yes, because that's really all we truly know at this point. Yes there ARE conservative women but they are far more rare than conservative men and there has never been a conservative female on the supreme court. It's just a fact, deal with it.

215 posted on 07/08/2018 8:32:17 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson