Not seeing how this is terrorism. An act that might be done for terrorism purposes, yes. Terrorism? No. Terrorism requires a terroristic motivation. It’s part of the definition. Remove that from the definition, and the lefties who oppose the sort of Acts containing such laws will technically be correct: if motive isn’t part of the definition of terrorism than bombing ISIS or AQII is terrorism.
“Not seeing how this is terrorism. “
What isn’t “terrorism” anymore given all the stupid laws congress passed and Bush signed in the panicky wake of 9/11.