Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

July 14th - Bastille Day: Baptism by Blood
Crisis Magazine ^ | July 15, 2008 | John Zmirak

Posted on 07/13/2018 9:33:01 AM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: DesertRhino

First of all, if Paul was wrong about that bit, Jesus would have had him incinerated in public, literally, and then threatened everyone into ignoring his words with the clear implication that anyone who heeds Paul’s words would meet the exact same fate, as God the father would not tolerate anyone speaking falsehoods about what he said under their authority. He certainly wouldn’t have let it into the New Testament, which alongside the Bible was authored by God himself.

Second of all, Stalin and Hitler were NOT appointed by God at all, considering they tried to exterminate Christians and made clear they adhered to atheism. This isn’t even remotely the same thing as the monarchies, who at least DID adhere to Christianity at least in public, if not in private.

Lastly, I’m not at all fond of Jefferson due to his supporting the Jacobins even after most of his contemporaries learned they were very bad news by the September Massacres. Besides, he also gutted the bible even more than Martin Luther did and stripped Jesus of any of his divine aspects, making him little different from the Dalai Lama. He can rot in a ditch for all I care.


41 posted on 07/20/2018 4:12:27 AM PDT by otness_e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

To be fair, Louis XVI was actually nothing like the guy shown in the GIF, and if anything DID come far closer to actually living the Christian life than most of the other nobles (Marie Antoinet as well). In fact, he so lived the Christian walk that the only reason he was denied Sainthood was because he ultimately failed to consecrate the Heart of Mary before being beheaded. He even forgave his executioners only to have his speech drowned out.


42 posted on 07/20/2018 4:17:54 AM PDT by otness_e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Actually, King Louis XVI not only was willing to accept reforms, he actually ATTEMPTED to make reforms in person. Unfortunately, most of the atheists helming the mobs thought he was too slow or less radical in his changes, and they decided to just off him. And that’s assuming the atheists heading the mobs actually CARED about reforms and just wanted ANY excuse to off the king for their own reasons.


43 posted on 07/20/2018 4:19:54 AM PDT by otness_e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

If you understand French, listen to Stephane Edouard of Hommes d’Influence , and he will demystify you the French woman quick.


44 posted on 07/24/2018 5:20:07 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: otness_e

Yes. Robespierre was only interested in Power.

It was all Machivellian


45 posted on 07/24/2018 5:21:07 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

Or at the very least destroying Christianity.

And it wasn’t just Robespierre, either. Even the French Philosophes had evidence of just wanting to cause a ruckus for the sake of it, in addition to deeply wanting Christianity dead.


46 posted on 07/25/2018 4:29:58 AM PDT by otness_e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson