1 posted on
07/17/2018 4:47:26 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; JosephW; Only1choice____Freedom; amigatec; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
2 posted on
07/17/2018 4:48:01 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
IF data are permitted to reside or be handled ON the endpoint, then utilize a container.
IF bandwidth is good, VDI, else, NOT!
NET: use both like my DoD customers
3 posted on
07/17/2018 5:00:18 AM PDT by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
To: ShadowAce
Unlocked doors or holes in the side of your house.
Which is more secure?
4 posted on
07/17/2018 6:07:57 AM PDT by
VanDeKoik
To: ShadowAce
Hey, an eclectic topic for FR ! :-)
In short, you measure how many lines of code a system -- be it bare metal, VM, or container -- uses to run a given application. The more code it runs, the more likely it is to have a HAP-level security hole.
I have a problem with this as a metric. In my opinion all assumptions derived from this are suspect. This measurement presumes all programmers are equal, and all code auditors are equal, and all code up the chain has been equally programmed and audited.
Only in the liberal fantasy world do all people remain equal throughout adulthood. There are gifted folks and there are folks who make a living programming that should never have access to a keyboard. Some code gets audited by an intelligent eye, some code is never seen by an auditor.
The quality of a software product does not necessarily decline as the lines of code increase.
5 posted on
07/17/2018 9:55:45 AM PDT by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: ShadowAce
Neither. Nuff said
7 posted on
07/17/2018 2:42:50 PM PDT by
ducttape45
("Righteousness exalteth a nation; but sin is a reproach to any people." Proverbs 14:34)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson