Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Genetically modified babies given go ahead by UK ethics body
The Guardian ^ | 17 July 2018 | Ian Sample

Posted on 07/17/2018 6:51:08 AM PDT by Heartlander

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: originalbuckeye

We are re-entering the days of Noah.


21 posted on 07/17/2018 7:35:42 AM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

We are re-entering the days of Noah.


22 posted on 07/17/2018 7:36:28 AM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

We are re-entering the days of Noah.


23 posted on 07/17/2018 7:37:26 AM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
Leach Scully said. In the event that the law is changed, gene editing of human embryos should be considered on a case-by-case basis by the fertility regulator, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, the report adds.

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) is an executive non-departmental public body of the Department of Health in the United Kingdom. It is a statutory body that regulates and inspects all clinics in the United Kingdom providing in vitro fertilisation (IVF), artificial insemination and the storage of human eggs, sperm or embryos. It also regulates human embryo research.

Of course, on a case by case basis.

Which of course means if you have the money and the political connections, by all means we can design a baby for you.

24 posted on 07/17/2018 7:38:07 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

They didn’t wait for all the evidence for this crap. Just read this this morning.

“CRISPR gene editing produces unwanted DNA deletions”

DNA-cutting enzyme used for genetic modification can create large deletions and shuffle genes.

snip

“The cell will try to stitch things back together,” says mouse geneticist Allan Bradley of the Wellcome Sanger Institute in Hinxton, UK, who led the study. “But it doesn’t really know what bits of DNA lie adjacent to each other.”

Researchers often use CRISPR to generate small deletions in the hope of knocking out a gene’s function. But when examining CRISPR edits, Bradley and his colleagues found large deletions — often several thousand DNA letters long — and complicated rearrangements of DNA sequences in which previously distant DNA sequences were stitched together. The phenomenon was prevalent in all three of the cell types they tested, including a kind of human cell grown in the laboratory.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05736-3


25 posted on 07/17/2018 7:58:15 AM PDT by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

Some I can understand correct. I am concerned about where the limits are though. Do you think we shouldn’t eliminate birth defects, diseases, etc?

Ultimately it probably won’t matter what laws a country passes. Some country somewhere is going to set no limits. People will be able to go there to get what they want.


26 posted on 07/17/2018 7:59:19 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

oh, no worries, even though DNA from a single cell can exonerate someone in the courts, they will kill whatever doesn’t come out right.

And they wonder why they are being invaded. HA!


27 posted on 07/17/2018 8:00:32 AM PDT by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

Muslim DNA ,LOL


28 posted on 07/17/2018 8:12:06 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

“This is an announcement from Genetic Control..... It is my sad duty to inform you of a four-foot restriction on Humanoid height.”


29 posted on 07/17/2018 8:31:04 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird
What if a boy is going to grow to a max height of 5’2’ and by tweaking something you can change that to 5’10’?

I'm NOT overweight ... I'm under-tall!

30 posted on 07/17/2018 8:43:07 AM PDT by BlueLancer (Antifa and Social Justice Warriors (SJWs) = SturmAbteilung)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

We completely and utterly lack the knowledge to responsibly address those things.

One example, eliminating sickle cell anemia sounds like a good idea.
But in Africa where it is most prevalent it became prevalent because it also helps.those who have it survive malaria.

How many things are like that?

You have to pass bill before you can find out what’s in it.

You have to eliminate genetic oddities before you find out they are prerequisites for surviving forgotten epidemics.


31 posted on 07/17/2018 11:03:25 AM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson