Why does nobody asked this question about the Russian indictments?

[MNDude]

It seems as if everyone including so-called conservative voices are accepting the Russian indictments as valid. Why?

We know that Mueller's Witch Hunt investigation consist mostly of radically devoted Democrats who have all donated huge sums of money to the Democrat Party. Does he his investigation have one Republican, or even one independent?

After over a year, Mueller is finally indicted 12 Russians for hacking the Democrat server. They claim that the FBI nor anyone in the government was ever allowed to look at the Democrat server. So I am very curious to know how you can possibly have an ounce of evidence that 12 people on the other side of the world hacked a server that not a single person involved in their investigation has inspected.

As if there was not enough Optics of bias, after over 400 Days of providing Nothing in This Witch Hunt investigation, Mueller announces the indictments immediately before the Russian Summit, thus damaging the outcome.

All of the people who are indicted are in Russia, and we will never be shown any of the evidence. We basically just have to take corrupt Mueller's word for it all.

So usual nauseous self-proclaimed conservative voices who love to show the world how impartial they are by their ability to attack the president (Like Hugh Hewitt) are joining in with the leftist narrative.

[Mr. K]

ALL WE NEED IS HILLIARY’s (ILLEGAL) SERVER TO KNOW THE TRUTH

WHERE IS IT?

(Rhetorical, I know it’s probably long gone.)

[Sparky1776]

Because Nobody doesn’t exist, what you need is a Somebody.

[rigelkentaurus]

At this point, the server is useless for any legal purposes. As for the “Russians” that were indicted, I, for one, believe that they are just as real as unicorns.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Russia,Russia,Russia is a cover for the real leak from the DNC to Wikileaks, his name was Seth Rich.
He was murdered for it.

THAT’S what they want to keep under wraps.

[Alberta's Child]

I don't think the indictments themselves are questionable on that basis alone. I'm sure there are tools that can be used to track infiltration attempts into a computer network activity from the outside. If you send an e-mail to someone, for example, who erases it completely from his computer and then destroys his computer, YOU would still have a record of the e-mail traffic ... and there would be multiple intermediate servers for your domain that would also have evidence of it as well.

The BIGGER question I have is this:

Why would the U.S. Justice Department go to such lengths to hold a press conference to announce these twelve indictments of foreign nationals ... and then immediately announce that the case is being handed off to a national security division of the DOJ where the trials are not held in public courtrooms (if they are ever held at all)?

The whole narrative is filled with information from top to bottom that cannot -- and WILL NOT -- ever be verified.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Hewitt is a Cheap Labor propagandist and has been for years.
If you’ll notice, all of the people having a hissy fit are all open borders types.

[Alberta's Child]

P.S. -- What you saw last week was the equivalent of the President of the United States holding a major press conference to announce a lunar mission next year ... and then immediately announcing that there will be no further information given out about it and no media reports will be given because NASA will be conducting it as a highly classified mission.

Anyone who heard such nonsense would rightly conclude that the lunar mission is nothing but fiction.

[mountainlion]

Q says we have the server. The only thing they do not have is a method to prosecute with out the deep state going nuclear. 50,000 sealed indictment shows they are busy.

[ratzoe]

Russia,Russia,Russia is a cover for the real leak from the DNC to Wikileaks, his name was Seth Rich. He was murdered for it. THAT’S what they want to keep under wraps.

Exactly..how did the Russians get into the DNC to download all the data?? It's been reported for over a year that the data was downloaded at a speed that couldn't have been done remotely.

[Kozy]

Hewitt is a steamy pile of fecal matter.

[GreenHornet]

The announcement of these indictments was deliberately timed by Mueller a few days before President Trump’s summit meeting with Putin. Mueller knows there’s no way he can actually get these Russians into a courtroom. Consequently, there ‘s no reason why he could not have waited on the indictments until after the summit meeting. Mueller made his announcement when he did in an attempt to sabotage the summit and try to make President Trump as uncomfortable as possible going into the meeting.

[EC Washington]

How about the $Millions Slick Willy took for his “speeches” in Russia? I’m sure the Russian have plenty of video evidence showing Former President Clinton and a room full of Moscow Hookers.

[logi_cal869]

Concorde Management responded to Mueller and he is now compelled to.produce discovery.

That’s my understanding.

[Jaxter]

Another question that hasn't been asked, as far as I know anyway, is if the evidence the indictments are based on leads directly to Putin, why wasn't he indicted?

[AppyPappy]

Considering you can fake IP Addresses, I can’t imagine we know for certain where the phishing emails originated.

[hillarys cankles]

The only one bringing the farcicle indictments is rush. Maybe someone else has also brought them up but I haven’t heard it. Hewitt, I’ve been done with him for years. I switched him on for 2 minutes this morning. Those 2 minutes was handwringing asking trump’s cabinet not to quit over their bosses gaff yesterday.

[Maelstorm]

I personally don’t believe any of it. I have worked in IT including under DHS and I know damn well that real professional hackers dont leave any direct evidence. Just because you trace something to Russia in general doesn’t mean they would ever be able to trace it directly to an official Russia agent. Even the most wild claims about Putin having people murdered have no hard evidence outside of the circumstantial.

There is no way serious Russian hackers officially employed by the Russia government would ever be directly connected to hacking. If it were that easy we’d see indictments all the time. What happened is they have a list of Russian agents that simply happen to be Russian agents. They didn’t care really because they knew the indictments are toothless and not even designed to target Russia but instead were designed to embarrass and pressure the President. The problem these “intellgence” fucks is they don’t seem to realize how the average American views their subterfuge based on recent history.

It would be different if we didn’t know that the intelligence agencies were corrupt and actively trying to disrupt the election of our President. It would be different if they hadn’t failed us on 911, on Iraq WMDs, on the investigation of Hillary Clinton who they openly said was guilty of a crime but effectively would receive a pass while average joe soldiers were being sent to prison for less. So they expect us to trust them when they ask us to believe they some how proved that a specific list of Russian agents hacked a DNC server as if those agents were hacking in their underwear from a server in their personal bathroom on an unmasked personal internet connection?

Anyone who believes these fucks is an idiot and sadly there are plenty of Republican cold warriors who are idiots yet fawn over the communist Chinese as if they can do no wrong when it is they not the Russians which are our real enemy.

[Gahanna Bob]

This begs the question, how is hacking the DNC server a national security concern? The DNC isn’t a government entity and they couldn’t have national secrets to be exploited.

[dartuser]

When I cancelled a comprimsed credit card last week I cut it up into 8 pieces. Then I gave 2 to the credit administrator in the credit union, put 2 in the Jimmy Johns trash after lunch, threw 2 in the dumpster outside my sons apartment complex, and threw the last 2 in my trash can at home.

I'm pretty sure the hard drives from Hillarys' and the DNC servers are in the same disposition across the nation.