Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q Anon: 07/29/18 "Trust The Plan"
qanon.pub ^ | 7/29/2018 | FReepers, vanity

Posted on 07/29/2018 11:11:53 AM PDT by ransomnote

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 2,381-2,392 next last
To: outofsalt

hard to keep up...especially when people say goodnight then keep posting....cripes.


41 posted on 07/29/2018 12:03:20 PM PDT by stylin19a (Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: All

Eagle Flag

QOVFEFE™


42 posted on 07/29/2018 12:03:55 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
NEW Q

#1754

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 58456f No.2340661 📁
Jul 29 2018 14:00:12 (EST)
660B05E7-52AE-499C-A35A-4A10A1666871.png

Offices of MA.
Work on Sunday?
Who is supplying feed?
Who is financing?
Q

______________________________________________________

43 posted on 07/29/2018 12:06:34 PM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Avenatti’s web site won’t open for me. Anyone got a screen shot?


44 posted on 07/29/2018 12:08:12 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i
Layers.


45 posted on 07/29/2018 12:09:15 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Never ever seen that word except in legal briefs where the phrase is always “gravamen of the claim”. It’s one of those words that makes you look lawyerly.


46 posted on 07/29/2018 12:09:37 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edzo4

Now the President has sicced his intelligence apparatus to spy on the doings of a person who simply opposes him in civil litigation??? Obstruction!!! This is an outrage!


47 posted on 07/29/2018 12:11:16 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Mossad


48 posted on 07/29/2018 12:11:42 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
Oooh I love the smell of creepy porn lawyer’s web site crashing from all the hits it just got! Seriously, it’s DOWN. ROFLMAO!

English, please.

Sometimes I'm very slow on the uptake, and this is one of those times. Are we talking about Q post #1752 with this,

https://avenatti.com
Buckle up!

Is that some guy named Avenatti's building? Who is he? What is that link to. The one that won't load for me?

I hate feeling left out. Bring me into the loop, O my brothers.

Bagster


49 posted on 07/29/2018 12:12:10 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
NEW Q

#1755

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 58456f No.2340833 📁
Jul 29 2018 14:07:21 (EST)

Anonymous ID: e9ec7a No.2340789 📁
Jul 29 2018 14:05:36 (EST)
>>2340661
ARE WE LIVE ?? DO IT!!
>>2340789
5 min delay.
Message sent.
Q

_________________________________________________

50 posted on 07/29/2018 12:12:49 PM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Israel last.


51 posted on 07/29/2018 12:13:09 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: edzo4

offices looked empty to me ... who is person in pic? Avenatti or Cohen? Can you imagine the turmoil that’s just been unleashed there? Absolutely brilliant!


52 posted on 07/29/2018 12:13:44 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Slider is a thread hijacker, one who does it purposefully to get the thread off track.


53 posted on 07/29/2018 12:14:24 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: All

For anyone wondering
the picture in drop 1754
is taken from a reflection
of a side view mirror on
a mercedes

No I do not know the make and model


54 posted on 07/29/2018 12:15:37 PM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i

I think this new post falls in line with the theory that Giuliani and his Rico experience was brought in to tie everything all together in one big criminal conspiracy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act#Application_of_RICO_laws

Under RICO, a person who has committed “at least two acts of racketeering activity” drawn from a list of 35 crimes—27 federal crimes and 8 state crimes—within a 10-year period can be charged with racketeering if such acts are related in one of four specified ways to an “enterprise”.[citation needed] Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and sentenced to 20 years in prison per racketeering count.In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of “racketeering activity.”

When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, they have the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to temporarily seize a defendant’s assets and prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a performance bond. This provision was placed in the law because the owners of Mafia-related shell corporations often absconded with the assets. An injunction and/or performance bond ensures that there is something to seize in the event of a guilty verdict.

In many cases, the threat of a RICO indictment can force defendants to plead guilty to lesser charges, in part because the seizure of assets would make it difficult to pay a defense attorney. Despite its harsh provisions, a RICO-related charge is considered easy to prove in court since it focuses on patterns of behavior as opposed to criminal acts.

RICO also permits a private individual “damaged in his business or property” by a “racketeer” to file a civil suit. The plaintiff must prove the existence of an “enterprise”. The defendant(s) are not the enterprise; in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s) and the enterprise: either the defendant(s) invested the proceeds of the pattern of racketeering activity into the enterprise (18 U.S.C. § 1962(a)); or the defendant(s) acquired or maintained an interest in, or control of, the enterprise through the pattern of racketeering activity (subsection (b)); or the defendant(s) conducted or participated in the affairs of the enterprise “through” the pattern of racketeering activity (subsection (c)); or the defendant(s) conspired to do one of the above (subsection (d)). In essence, the enterprise is either the ‘prize,’ ‘instrument,’ ‘victim,’ or ‘perpetrator’ of the racketeers. A civil RICO action can be filed in state or federal court.


55 posted on 07/29/2018 12:15:37 PM PDT by edzo4 ("Well I truly would be thrilled if all/most of the Q stuff turns out to be real")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

That’s what I inferred ... that’s what was said ... that’s what’s now been dropped in the middle of that post. what a timeline! ;)


56 posted on 07/29/2018 12:16:02 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: edzo4
sliding is bringing up unrelated topics to distract and ‘slide’ the discussion in another direction

Ahhh, thankQ edzo.

*scratches out note about White Castle burgers.*

Bagster


57 posted on 07/29/2018 12:19:14 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Disestablishmentarian

Also noteworthy is when he says people will be shocked in the 20 redacted pages. Not sure which pages he’s referring to but it sounds like we’ll find out sooner or later.


58 posted on 07/29/2018 12:19:50 PM PDT by Snowybear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bagster

placemark


59 posted on 07/29/2018 12:20:20 PM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Snowybear

1755
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 58456f No.2340833
Jul 29 2018 14:07:21 (EST)
Anonymous ID: e9ec7a No.2340789
Jul 29 2018 14:05:36 (EST)
>>2340661
ARE WE LIVE ?? DO IT!!
>>2340789
5 min delay.
Message sent.
Q


60 posted on 07/29/2018 12:20:21 PM PDT by edzo4 ("Well I truly would be thrilled if all/most of the Q stuff turns out to be real")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 2,381-2,392 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson