Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should You Take Social Security at 62, 66, or 70?
The Motley Fool ^ | updated on January 11, 2018, and originally published on March 25, 2017 | Todd Campbell (TMFEBCapital)

Posted on 08/02/2018 9:22:46 AM PDT by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 next last
To: Starstruck

You mean after I die?


121 posted on 08/02/2018 11:18:08 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: HotHunt

I was 62 so perhaps that is why I did not need to sign up until no longer covered by my wife a few years later


122 posted on 08/02/2018 11:20:59 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Bkmk


123 posted on 08/02/2018 11:21:10 AM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

No. She would be entitled to your full amount if you go first. My wife only worked enough to get a few hundred dollar of SS but by using my earnings she gets a thousand a month which is half of what I get.


124 posted on 08/02/2018 11:24:00 AM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

There is no gain without risk. Find a Mutual Fund with a good track record. Dipping below Principal is not a bad thing so long as you don’t sell it. It always eventually comes back.
When the market is down, you are just buying stocks cheaper.


125 posted on 08/02/2018 11:27:25 AM PDT by AppyPappy (Don't mistake your dorm political discussions with the desires of the nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

I need to look into that. Half of mine is about $1300, but she only gets 900. She’s 64, though.


126 posted on 08/02/2018 11:28:23 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: BobL

thanks...sorry. I see it. I know better. No way did i mean to imply taxed at an 85% rate. I even gave a link to it.
thanks


127 posted on 08/02/2018 11:30:56 AM PDT by stylin19a (Best.Election.Of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
But if you start collecting at 62 by the time you are 70 how much have you collected? Approximately 72000 dollars.

Now if you start collecting at 70 and only live another 5 years, how much did you collect? Approximately 78000 dollars...its pretty close.

And no guarantee when you will die.
I work out 6 days, regular check ups, watch my diet but tend to over eat at times. I don't drink.

I was born in 62(cannot brag about that anymore LOL) and when I was growing up, I saved for retirement as if SS did not exist. I do not have to rely on SS to have a great retirement. I will never be a burden to society.

128 posted on 08/02/2018 11:34:04 AM PDT by Uversabound (Might does not make right, but it does enforce the commonly recognized rights of each succeeding gen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

He’s not dead. Amazingly. ;)

Yes, I know. I’m just going to wait and see which pays me more and go that route. Mine alone will be adequate for my needs, but I’m not going to turn down more money! :)


129 posted on 08/02/2018 11:35:07 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

No prob...I figured. Just that radio infomercial sends me off!


130 posted on 08/02/2018 11:35:08 AM PDT by BobL (I drive a pick up truck because it makes me feel like a man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

That is probably the problem. I had my wife wait until 66 to take SS. It may not be convenient but you can pay the money back and wait a year or two to get a better return. Also she probably wouldn’t get your full amount if you go first.


131 posted on 08/02/2018 11:35:26 AM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

I just checked. My wife is currently receiving her own benefits (started at age 64). At age 66, when I start receiving benefits, hers will increase to 42% of mine. It will be a bump, but only $150 a month. Better than nothing.

At least, that is how I interpret it...


132 posted on 08/02/2018 11:39:40 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

When we read this stuff, we were absolutely amazed at just how convoluted this whole thing actually is.

I’m fine with just seeing it bumped up a bit when we both turn 66. We’re only six days apart, btw.

I did a lot of calculations regarding early vs late benefits. I still think it was the right thing to do to take hers when we did. The benefit it brings us today is huge, for reasons I’ll avoid getting into. Much bigger than the benefit of waiting.


133 posted on 08/02/2018 11:51:21 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
How long will you live? If you plan on living a long time - wait.

Which reminds me of this: Do you want to make God laugh? Tell Him your plans.

134 posted on 08/02/2018 11:59:39 AM PDT by mc5cents (Pray for a new Pope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Age 64 is only a 13% reduction. It would take approximately 12 years to hit the point where you start losing money by taking it early.


135 posted on 08/02/2018 12:00:29 PM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

Yep. That’s why we did what we did. :)

And the timing advantage was actually huge, Without getting into details, it’s along the lines of “$1,000 in hand today is worth more than $5,000 in a year.”

13% was a small hit. And its impact is really not that great.


136 posted on 08/02/2018 12:10:56 PM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
If the cause of death is the same then that gives a pretty good stake in the sand to make a decision.

SS is designed not to pay out as much as you pay in.

If you collect at 62 with a life expectancy of 15 years at 75% then you can weigh that against collecting at 66 with a life expectancy of 11 years at 100%.

Personally my dad died younger than the American average and that drove my decision. I hope you live long past you aunts and uncles and enjoy your SS to the max.

137 posted on 08/02/2018 12:34:30 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

I semi-retired at age 64. I quit my job and was hired back as a contractor. I worked less than 20 hours a week and could choose when I wanted to work. I had to flip my 401k to an IRA and probably lost out on about 200k in company stock growth over the next 2 years. I don’t regret it at all.


138 posted on 08/02/2018 12:35:39 PM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

As I understand it, the penalty is 10% for each year you delay your part B. I don’t think you are penalized if you never enroll. That said, Medicare part B (and a supplemental plan F) was a much better deal than the health coverage I received at work—better coverage at about 2/3rds the cost.


139 posted on 08/02/2018 12:36:04 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’m taking it at 62. Wait at your own risk. I’ve known too many people who’s only benefits were the $ 255 burial benefit


140 posted on 08/02/2018 12:36:11 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson