Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't Look Now — But Ted Cruz Was Exactly Right About ObamaCare
Investor's Business Daily ^ | Bob Maistros

Posted on 08/31/2018 4:03:29 AM PDT by IBD editorial writer

He was selling "snake oil," "making a false and politically damaging promise," committing "a fraud on the American people," and "(doing) his country a major disservice." He was "creating a huge distraction" by pursuing "a fool's errand" and "the dumbest idea" one Senator claimed he had ever heard. He was a "false leader" engaging in "government terrorism."

In sum, he was a "joke, plain and simple," and as one especially distinguished colleague affectionately recalled, "Lucifer in the flesh."

And those were all descriptions from his own party.

Oh, by the way: Ted Cruz was also right.

The vilification Cruz endured from fellow Republicans back in October 2013 stemmed from his to-the-mattresses battle to shut down the government in hopes of defunding the Affordable Care Act (ACA), or ObamaCare, before it could take full effect.

Now, Fox News is reporting that the once-hated program is more popular than the GOP's signature initiative — the recent tax cut. Which should be no surprise.

Because the lonely stand of the Lone Star State's junior Senator stemmed from his apprehension that "(President Barack Obama's) strategy is to get as many Americans as possible hooked on the subsidies, addicted to the sugar. ... If we get to January 1 (2014), this thing is here forever."

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: obamacare; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Alberta's Child

Oh the Freeper community supports repeal but just make sure their health insurance covers preexisitng conditions and that the premiums are affordable. And they can go to any doctor they choose.

...and they can buy into the insurance anytime they wish, doctors will not make them wait, all care and treatments are covered,

But just don’t force them into paying for Obama Care. That isn’t right.


41 posted on 08/31/2018 7:35:21 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
It’s the GOP’s own incompetence that have brought them to this point.

"Incompetence" is the wrong word. We have been conned. The GOP is part of the Washington establishment and they just pretend to be conservative.

You already know what I have to say about the Washington Establishment, how it started, and who is currently behind it.

The goal of the establishment is to keep the money spending party going and anything which causes government to spend more money, is just fine with it.

I'll add that the media is liberal precisely because this works in the direction of increasing Washington spending.

42 posted on 08/31/2018 7:44:15 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The problem is that $55,000 worth of medical care is actually more like &5,500 worth of medical care if you take out all the phoney baloney bullsh*t they stick in the bills nowadays.

The medical system we have now is a sort of Ponzi scheme in which far more is charged for services than is actually given in services.

Also, the services are often not very good or competent.

43 posted on 08/31/2018 7:48:32 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
You already know what I have to say about the Washington Establishment, how it started, and who is currently behind it.

I do. And I'll give your opinions here the same consideration I give your opinions on the rebellion. I promise.

44 posted on 08/31/2018 7:50:51 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
I went to the ER last year. It was hilarious, in a painful way, to see a two hour visit escalate into $200,000 and going! There is something radically wrong here.

This. There is a lot of phoney crap going on in the medical system. This is no market based system. It's controlled by Government and Universities to restrict the supply of doctors, and even those that get through are regulated to a crazy extent. Everybody plays games with the billing to, among other things, offset the mandated costs of treating the indigent, who do not hesitate to go into a Hospital emergency room for a sniffle.

This is also an extension of the general education problem. Nowadays, it shouldn't cost several hundred thousand to get a degree. University "credentialism" is keeping those prices artificially high, and we need to first break that bubble so that we can get more people with degrees to be able to go to medical school.

I've heard Texas has been trying to implement a "$10,000 degree" program, and it seems to me this is a good beginning to addressing some of the underlying problems.

45 posted on 08/31/2018 7:55:17 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I agree. It’s an inevitable consequence of having an entire industry built on third-party payments.

This. It's the problem with all socialist ideas. Sooner or later you run out of other people's money. With no pressure to hold down costs, people don't try to conserve medical spending.

It's part of the problem. Not the only part, but it is a very significant part of it.

46 posted on 08/31/2018 7:57:27 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
I expect his primary reason was to hurt the President.

That's what I think too.

47 posted on 08/31/2018 8:00:18 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

No surprise to me. You never struck me as an individual that could separate emotion from objectivity. Once you’ve set your mind against something, it won’t get anywhere with you.


48 posted on 08/31/2018 8:03:32 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Great post. I believe a "single-payer" system is inevitable because that is the only system that can meet all of the conditions and expectations that we impose on ourselves -- which you lay out very clearly.

We cannot afford the standard of health care that we have come to expect as our God-given right.

The only way to cure people of a mass delusion like this is to have an all-powerful force (GOVERNMENT, in our case) do it for us. This type of arrangement is necessary because the delusion has to be cured by someone/something that can do whatever the hell it wants ... and the only thing the public can do is complain about it.

49 posted on 08/31/2018 8:33:21 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

You’re probably right. If that’s the case, we will soon find out because more and more people are waking up to this con game and cutting the insurers out of the process.


50 posted on 08/31/2018 8:35:10 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Couldn’t agree more, DL!


51 posted on 08/31/2018 8:52:39 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
Nowadays education shouldn't cost as much as it does. If we could solve the credentialism problem, Universities wouldn't have so much money with which to be insulated from ordinary people.

Breaking the Education monopoly will give us a win on so many levels.

52 posted on 08/31/2018 10:29:03 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

“In fairness, McCain voted against a repeal and replace. Had there been a clean repeal would he have voted differently?”

Not likely. (1) A yes vote would help Trump and we can’t have that, can we?? (2) McCain loved government control of citizens.


53 posted on 08/31/2018 7:13:11 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson