Seriously 10% of this forum better stock up on Depends because they are nothing but pee pee pants.
The women has actually done her allegation more discredit by no longer being anonymous....
1.Her story now does not match up with previously alleged assertions (2 boys, 4 boys?)
2. She can now be identified as a definite partisan as opposed to just a likely one. (Financial support of Democrat activist causes)
3. Blatant and dubious memory lapses concerning date, time, location,and host.)
4. Accused was never named in 36 years prior to being nominated for SCOTUS.
5. Lie detector data is notoriously unreliable hence it’s being barred from being used as evidence against any accused.
6.Demonstable inconsistencies in declared motivation, prior statements and 36 year behavioral history of alleged victim.
Too just name a few.
I know you were just naming a few, but for me the key one is the other guy that she said was there has strongly denied this ever happened.