Posted on 10/06/2018 6:37:10 PM PDT by SaveFerris
“I desire you would Remember the Ladies, and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors. Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the Husbands. Remember all Men would be tyrants if they could. If particular care and attention is not paid to the Ladies we are determined to foment a Rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any Laws in which we have no voice, or Representation”
Abigail Adams wrote that in 1776. Her words have never seemed more prescient than they do today.
Surely, this is a time where many ladies wish to foment a rebellion. So many of us, today, want to burn a system to the ground that could put a man like Brett Kavanaugh, a man accused of multiple accounts of sexual assault, on the Supreme Court. Especially when there is such a strong sense that justice has not been done.
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
They. Want. War.
It may be but it doesn't come up in a search at the link they provided. I used the first line in the search engine. Nada.
I hope they get it, because then they would be destroyed.
Right. Like earlier Democrats would lynch a black man who was merely accused of a sexual assault by a white woman without the slightest bit of evidence.
Tell them: Let's. Throw. Down.
Women would do well to remember the innate decency of American men. Were that not so women would have rights here similar to the ones they have in muslim countries. Don’t let the marxists destroy the love and respect we hold you in.
Come get some, bitch.
Wow, those FR threads are awesome, in numerous ways....
Thanks, I have missed much!
Supposedly an average woman today weighs as much as a man did in 1960. 166lbs. Men also supposedly ballooned, on average 195 lbs. The poorest are supposedly the MOST likely to be obese. In my opinion nothing widespread or sustained is going to happen while these conditions supposedly exist.
Do fat people have civil wars or unrest? First time for everything I guess.
Freegards
Not the Last Days, and I have been a fervent believer in the prophecies of Revelation since early 1968.
This is more like the early 1970’s with Patty Hearst, the Symbionese Liberation Army, and Angela Davis. Only their class & race enemies are now far better armed than then.
There’s going to be some flesh cut; theirs, not ours. Get over your inhibitions and be prepared to defend yourselves.
It’s fair to say that, among women, Kavanaugh’s speech did not go over too well.
But Donald Trump Jr. loved it. During the Trial, Trump Jr. tweeted, “I love Kavanaugh’s tone… others in the GOP should take notice!”
What trial?
Genuine historic quote.
Although at the time, it was offered and accepted as teasing. There were no revoltin’ women in screeching vagina costumes pacing back and forth in the Adams’ household, I can assure you.
i tried to read this nonsense until i realized it all sounded like blah, blah, blah ... and then gave up
Jennifer Wright with her husband Daniel (and i sh1t you not)Kibblesmith... who do you think wears the pants in that unit?
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Caption should read...
SHE:
‘Since President Trump upsets you, I think it is time we both started seeing other men’.
Bimbo eruptions from decades ago.
It’s encouraging to read the comments below this piece of crap in Yahoo.
John Adams: “We have only the name of masters, and rather than give up this, which would completely subject us to the despotism of the petticoat, I hope General Washington and all our brave heroes would fight.”
As opposed to speaking of the godless mobs of the street rabble, Abigail was speaking about, and to, heterosexual ladies, who were married Christians. She lived during an age where marriage was forever, wives and children were chattel property, and divorce meant that children stayed with their provider father, the divorcing woman a cast-off with no assets, little education and poor economic opportunity outside cottage industries.
She used the word, ‘rebellion’ in her quote, but she did not advocate ‘revolution’ in a George Washington sense of the word. To her, a women’s place in society was married, to support her husband’s household and increase social connections, and to educate and advise her children towards success and honor - all of which demanded education. Because her husband’s frequent travel allowed her liberty to run their farm, she became desireous all women have access not only public education, but also the ability to work outside the home to provide for their own financial needs. She believed it was necessary in order to bring about a better-educated populace, to allow widows, divorcees and the abandoned a path to avoid destitution, and to allow women their own place in society. She was not advocating for free-love, shacking-up, sexual fluidity, prostitution or subjugation of the role of men.
I would like to ask the writer WHEN was it ever OK to deny civil rights to a US citizen? Due process? Presumption of innocence? If she were accused of theft, forgery, assault or even plagiarism, she would be screaming bloody murder — that she was innocent until proven guilty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.