Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SleeperCatcher
Another option might be to sell it to an ally, though our CVN’s are expensive to maintain and the power plant probably needs repairs.

I did my initial nuclear quals on the A1W prototype in Idaho before reporting for submarine duty.

The power plants were basically larger submarine reactors. There were four control rooms on the Enterprise with two reactors controlled by each (for a total of eight reactors). The A1W prototype had one control room with two reactors.

The older submarine reactors had to be refueled periodically and that was a major expense. I never did a refueling while I was in the Navy but an eight reactor refueling is nothing to sneeze at. If they let it sit in port with a skeleton crew it will be far cheaper than decommissioning it. Then they can budget that in the future after throwing some money each year into a BIG E Decommissioning fund.

32 posted on 10/09/2018 11:57:40 AM PDT by politicianslie (OPTIMIST-Glass 1/2 full- PESSIMIST 1/2 empty TO ENGINEER, Glass is twice as big as it needs to be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: politicianslie

Makes sense (to an Army guy ;).

The cost of operations alone is too much for most countries, even rich European nations. Besides, they could build their own carriers if they wanted them, and they obviously don’t (save for Britain, France, Spain and Italy).


69 posted on 10/10/2018 8:02:38 AM PDT by SleeperCatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson