Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Red Badger
Woah! That’s great!
Carbon nanotubes today, graphine tomorrow...
2 posted on
10/19/2018 11:10:16 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: Red Badger
Trees have been doing it since the dawn of time right?
3 posted on
10/19/2018 11:10:17 AM PDT by
Samurai_Jack
(War is cruelty, there is no use trying to reform it; the crueler it is, the sooner it will be over.)
To: Red Badger
4 posted on
10/19/2018 11:11:19 AM PDT by
VanDeKoik
To: Red Badger
Creating the super-strong material out of something harmful could kill two birds with one stone. Stopped right there.
Carbon dioxide is CRITICAL to life as we know it. With carbon dioxide, plants die. Plants produce oxygen. We breathe oxygen. This is second-grade science. Why are they constantly pounding this "carbon dioxide is poison" schtick?
5 posted on
10/19/2018 11:12:38 AM PDT by
rarestia
(Repeal the 17th Amendment and ratify Article the First to give the power back to the people!)
To: Red Badger
The concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide is at its highest levels in hundreds of thousands of years and as matters get worse...Yeah, those archived readings from tens and hundreds of thousands of years ago show how badly we are polluted with plant food.
7 posted on
10/19/2018 11:14:30 AM PDT by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: Red Badger
Let’s turn global warming into a space elevator!
8 posted on
10/19/2018 11:15:19 AM PDT by
bigbob
(Trust Sessions. Trust the Plan.)
To: Red Badger
Can we burn them for Fuel ? LOL
To: Red Badger
They’ve figured out a way to make four leaf clovers.
10 posted on
10/19/2018 11:16:10 AM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Red Badger
something harmful Carbon dioxide is "something harmful"?
Tell me more about how leftist are pro-science.
12 posted on
10/19/2018 11:18:38 AM PDT by
dead
To: Red Badger
Who writes this stuff. CO2 is heavier than air. This is evidenced by all the phytoplankton in the sea. Without CO2, all plant life in the ocean dies.
So stupid.
To: Red Badger
“This process creates dilithium”
Scotty says, “I’ll drink to that!”
15 posted on
10/19/2018 11:20:40 AM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Red Badger
Then last thing liberals want is a solution.
17 posted on
10/19/2018 11:21:51 AM PDT by
Raycpa
To: Red Badger
The religion of ‘Global Warming’ in a nutshell:
- CO2 is a greenhouse gas that threatens Earth with overheating in spite of it being intrinsic to the survival of life on Earth via plant photosynthesis.
- therefor....
- CO2 is a pollutant.
- therefor....
- CO2 pollution must be reduced to save Earth.
- therefor....
- Leftists are good because they fight pollution from CO2 emissions.
- therefor....
- 'Global Warming' deniers are evil because they don't fight pollution from CO2 emissions.
- therefor....
- CO2 is exhaled by humans.
- therefor....
- Non-leftist humans must be eliminated and pay for the privilege of being genocided via carbon taxes.
21 posted on
10/19/2018 11:38:13 AM PDT by
WMarshal
(America First)
To: Red Badger
Scientists at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee, alongside private sector scientists there, have developed a non-traditional way to construct small-diameter carbon nanotubes, called CNTsGlobal warming people are a bunch of CNTs.
23 posted on
10/19/2018 11:53:08 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(The News Misleadia will be held accountable for their lies.....on the eleventy-first of Nevervember.)
To: Red Badger
More commonly used for health purposes, lithium carbonate is often used in tandem with treatment of mental health disorders.
Make that *three* birds, treatment for leftists being the third.
To: Red Badger
The author needs to go back and take 7th grade science again. This process does NOT remove CO2 from the air, it removes if from lithium carbonate. The amount of CO2 in the air stays exactly the same. In addition, the energy to liberate the carbon requires more burning of fossil fuels than is “captured”. Why not simply use the carbon in coal? Besides all that, the mass of useful nanotubes is trivial compared with the mass of CO2 the Global Warming religious zealots want removed.
29 posted on
10/19/2018 3:40:18 PM PDT by
norwaypinesavage
(The stone age didn't end because we ran out of stones.)
To: Red Badger
I haven’t cranked the numbers, but I strongly suspect any CO2 -—to-—> carbon nanotubes reaction is going to be exergonic - it’s going to be a process that’s uphill in energy.
And if I’m right and you’ve got to put a pile of energy into the process to get it to go, I doubt you’re going to get that energy from sunshine or your friendly neighborhood windmill - not if you have to work with a molten salt at a temperature of over 700 degrees.
31 posted on
10/19/2018 5:02:37 PM PDT by
Stosh
To: Red Badger
How about feeding it to plants? You know, air for plants? Going green? Save the Planet type stuff.
33 posted on
10/19/2018 5:08:52 PM PDT by
YogicCowboy
("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
To: Red Badger
How preposterous is this?
Mankind puts out 1010 tons of CO2 per year.
How many devices that weigh 10-10 tons would have to be made every year to put a dent in CO2 output?
Maybe if every human being on the planet needed ten million of them every year.
To: Red Badger
Propaganda.
“The main cause of global warming is CO2.” Just plain false on many fronts.
Assuming you buy many of their assumptions, water vapor has about 100 time the concentration as co2. (Ps - this is rarely mentioned because mankind does not impact atmospheric water at all.)
38 posted on
10/19/2018 6:28:44 PM PDT by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson