As you surely know, it means what the Supreme Court decides it means.
Seems to me that “herein granted” means the legislative powers that are described in the constitution and nothing else.
If it isn’t described, then the Congress and Senate can not legislate it... thus why a constitutional amendment had to be added to eliminate alcoholic beverages, the congress could not ban it. States could, but not Congress.
Worked for a while, until they discovered the good & plenty clause, and the interstate commerce clause and stretched them to infinity and beyond.
Which Supreme Court?
Do you think this Supreme Court can't have an opposite ruling from a previous Supreme Court decision? For the record, yes it can.
Previous Supreme Court decisions along with Hillary Clinton’s record of poor judgment are part of the reason Donald Trump became president.