If it’s the EU looking to do this, then they seek to do the opposite of what they declare.
1 posted on
11/12/2018 6:49:03 AM PST by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
2 posted on
11/12/2018 6:54:22 AM PST by
keat
To: Olog-hai
“hate speech” as defined by leftists. No thanks.
3 posted on
11/12/2018 6:54:23 AM PST by
MulberryDraw
(Dah Dah Dit Dah)
To: Olog-hai
I agree. A Globalist approach to fighting cybercrime is most likely to be a Globalist approach to steal personal information for nefarious reasons.
4 posted on
11/12/2018 6:55:38 AM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: Olog-hai
Orwellian language translated:
Interference in elections = Republicans/Conservatives/Nationalists winning.
Hate speech = Telling the truth.
5 posted on
11/12/2018 7:00:02 AM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
("It's Slappin' Time !")
To: Olog-hai
A better headline would be “50 countries learn how to do cybercrime.”
To: Olog-hai
The Euroweenies always declare crap, but they never do it.
The US is fighting cyber crime and has billions of dollars and major military commands to do it.
7 posted on
11/13/2018 5:52:48 AM PST by
CodeToad
( Hating on Trump is hating on me and America!.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson