Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bull Snipe

I knew we supplied the Russians. Had no idea of the number but assumed it was high.
Never knew about the diesel either.
I learn something every day. Now if I could remember.....

The Shermans were easy to produce, light enough for most bridges and nimble.
However the propensity to burn and the short barreled low velocity main gun made them unequal to the task of taking on a Panther or even a Mark IV.

As a kid I read a book about the convoys to Russia. There were MEN crewing those ships.


20 posted on 11/14/2018 11:41:02 AM PST by oldvirginian ( Buckle up kids, rough road ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: oldvirginian; Bull Snipe
As a kid I read a book about the convoys to Russia. There were MEN crewing those ships.

One of the best books that I ever read about the Russian convoys was fiction:


21 posted on 11/14/2018 11:47:16 AM PST by BlueLancer (Orchides Forum Trahite - Cordes Et Mentes Veniant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: oldvirginian

At the time the Sherman was designed, the bulk of Kraut armor was the MK III, and short barrel 75mm MK IVs. In early 1941, the Sherman, as designed, was superior to both.
As the war progressed, the Sherman was modified to meet the increasing capability of the MK IV, by that time the backbone of German armored forces. It was never envisioned as an equal to the MK V and MK VI tanks. When the Sherman was designed, the Americans didn’t even know the Germans were creating these designs.


23 posted on 11/14/2018 11:55:32 AM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson