Massive crater under Greenland’s ice points to climate-altering impact in the time of humans

ScienceMag.com ^ | Nov 14, 2018 | Paul Voosen

[ar15ona]

I read the article until it stated “Until human-driven global warming set in...” and then I hung up the megaphone

[ar15ona]

I read the article until it stated “Until human-driven global warming set in...” and then I hung up the megaphone

[fieldmarshaldj]

Probably gave the native folk permanent orange afros.

[ETL]

given the fact that ice ages only make up about 25% of earth’s geologic history,

. Where did you get that from?

[adaven]

I’m sure Graham Hancock is smiling about this story.

[SunkenCiv]

And deafness. That's probably what led to the invention of writing. ;^)

[Interesting Times]

Possible Younger Dryas impact site found.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

[noiseman]

Great comparison. I never connected the two.

[OldWPGrad]

FYI - another idea on the matter, found here: https://theworldwideflood.com/2018/03/02/letter-to-the-editors-journal-of-geology/

[zot]

Thanks for the ping. Fascinating discovery.

[politicianslie]

Not the FAKED data from that moron at NASA.

As anyone can see, the "scientists" correct the measured temperatures and correct them to show GLOBULL WARMING.

It's not hard to do either. Lower temperatures before about the year 2000 and raise them AFTERWARDS. IT appears the morons are "adjusting" temperatures to make them consistent with their increasing CO2 levels cause temperature increases; ie, it used to be cooler than the measured temperatures indicated and for the last few years it is hotter than the measured temperatures indicate.

YES, the average American is stupid enough to believe that is true.

A review of the graph shows that temperatures the last few decades have been less than temperature measurements from the 1930's which clearly shows there IS NO GLOWBULL WARMING! This is one of NOAA's graphs.

[Honest Nigerian]

Interesting article, but hard to take them seriously after that sentence...
I am so sick of this bull$hit. Show us factual data of this ‘settled science’ on climate change...?
Not the FAKED data from that moron at NASA.
*************************************************
It is an interesting article. And it is chock-full of speculations, qualifications, reservations and admissions that “no one knows”, etc.
.
BTW - data is just a big pile of numbers. There are lots of different ways to interpret the data. And one’s beliefs are the primary drivers of the interpretation/s (a/k/a “conclusion/s”).

[fruser1]

University of Illinois had ice age info online and they showed a timeline with ice ages. I just approximated from that. I saw the site years ago and not sure if still there. I’ll look.

[fruser1]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_glaciation

I didn't do the math but this wiki page has the info I recollect. I didn't see the old site I mentioned but it was at isgs.illinois.edu

[csvset]

Hidden beneath Hiawatha is a 31-kilometer-wide impact crater, big enough to swallow Washington, D.C.,

If only. How is it the glacier is named Hiawatha ?

[ETL]

Nice gifs. I was going to post something similar (milk drop gif) later today when I had access to a PC.

[dennisw]

Very cool research by real scientists.

[Sawdring]

A big piece of the puzzle for Randall Carlson.

[bert]

-———Until human-driven global warming set in, that period reigned as one of the sharpest recent swings in temperature on Earth.——

-—Evidently they believe climate never changed until humans arrived-—

I interpret the article to be flawed by the belief that human caused climate change is in fact equatrd to the natural or impact relatd climate change