[Mr. K]

"Until human-driven global warming set in"

Interesting article, but hard to take them seriously after that sentence...

I am so sick of this bull$hit. Show us factual data of this 'settled science' on climate change...?

Not the FAKED data from that moron at NASA.

[politicianslie]

Not the FAKED data from that moron at NASA.

As anyone can see, the "scientists" correct the measured temperatures and correct them to show GLOBULL WARMING.

It's not hard to do either. Lower temperatures before about the year 2000 and raise them AFTERWARDS. IT appears the morons are "adjusting" temperatures to make them consistent with their increasing CO2 levels cause temperature increases; ie, it used to be cooler than the measured temperatures indicated and for the last few years it is hotter than the measured temperatures indicate.

YES, the average American is stupid enough to believe that is true.

A review of the graph shows that temperatures the last few decades have been less than temperature measurements from the 1930's which clearly shows there IS NO GLOWBULL WARMING! This is one of NOAA's graphs.

[Honest Nigerian]

Interesting article, but hard to take them seriously after that sentence...
I am so sick of this bull$hit. Show us factual data of this ‘settled science’ on climate change...?
Not the FAKED data from that moron at NASA.
*************************************************
It is an interesting article. And it is chock-full of speculations, qualifications, reservations and admissions that “no one knows”, etc.
.
BTW - data is just a big pile of numbers. There are lots of different ways to interpret the data. And one’s beliefs are the primary drivers of the interpretation/s (a/k/a “conclusion/s”).

[PA Engineer]

Until human-driven global warming set in

Yep. They had to get that in there. Take a fascinating subject and contaminate it with BS politics. Sometimes I just want to throw up on the floor.