Study: Nearly ALL mass shootings since 1950 occurred in ‘gun-free zones’

The National Sentinel ^ | 11/21/18 | USA Features

[SleeperCatcher]

Easy targets: They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different result or outcome.

Given that, you could certainly say the Left’s default “solution” to the problem of mass shootings — more gun-free zones — is insane.

A new study proves that. Again.

[rktman]

The 100/day the anti 2nd America haters talk about? Guess they don’t get that if not for the 2nd, they may not be afforded the opportunity to talk crap.

[Trumpisourlastchance]

I wonder why that would be? [sarcasm]

[DaveA37]

The gun grabbers will cry “foul” claiming this, yet another revealing study, takes away from the war on gun confiscation they so eagerly desire.

[Rad_J]

Many criminals hate cops. Yet they don’t go shoot up a police station. Odd.

[OttawaFreeper]

And they don’t seem to happen in places like Maine or Vermont or the Dakotas or elsewhere where permits to carry open or concealed are not legally required.

[adorno]

I highly doubt that liberals care about gun registrations or preventing guns from getting into the wrong hands or preventing gun crimes.

What democrats like or want, is the issue. The issue of guns is just another one that they use to win over voters, and also to demonize republicans.

The fact is that, there are enough gun laws on the books now to prevent guns from getting into the wrong hands, and there are enough laws in the books to punish heavily those who commit their crimes with guns.

What democrats want is the perception that they care about protecting people from gun crimes, and so, they will continue to propose as many gun laws and regulations as it will take to win over the voters. It doesn’t matter that laws might already exist to take care of the matter, it’s about the perception that they care, even if they could care less. And, they don’t care, as witnessed by what occurs in those gun-free zones and in murder towns like Chicago, and other criminal-loving havens.

[rktman]

Pretty sure you’ve seen this:

http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/748675/gun-violencemessaging-guide-pdf-1.pdf

Their go to guide book on vilifying 2nd amendment folks.

[Beowulf9]

Perfectly said.

[jughandle]

Priceless, didn’t go through all 80 pages yet but they do openly place quite a bit of emphasis on emotion.

[Mr. K]

Maybe the sign is not big enough?

[SoConPubbie]

Almost every mass shooting was committed by a Democrat.

[rktman]

Their playbook for sure. Probably getting dog eared lately. The chitcago hospital thing got quiet pretty quick.

[allwrong57]

There is a real short supply of common sense. This is too easy, let’s just ban everything! It’s the Dem/Nazi/Socialist/Communist way.

[Responsibility2nd]

One would think that an army base would not be a gun free zone.

But it was.

And one Nidal Hasan took full advantage of that.

[Morpheus2009]

Remember the Democrats really sought Alcohol prohibition as a solution. Remember how that worked out?

[Morpheus2009]

Was the perp not white? That would answer your question?

[Wuli]

People have a misunderstanding of most of what police do. Folks have been indoctrinated in the erroneous belief that “the police will protect them”, and thus they, the sheeple, have no need of a gun. Yet most often the police do not act or operate so as to prevent crime. They can’t; they are not psychics; they don’t know where the next crime will occur. In connection with crime most of the time the police arrive after the fact. The one main act of crime prevention that police do is finding and arresting those who have already committed a crime; taking them off the street. That they can. Meanwhile, don’t think they are following that home inruder that may choose your house. They don’t know who that is or when he will act.

[joethedrummer]

...because guns are basically for self PROTECTION/ self DEFENSE.

The messed up folks using them to kill are the exceptions.

NOBODY in office is willing to make this distinction.

Same thing with immigration vs. ILLEGAL immigration.

I for one am tired of “Representatives” who refuse to REPRESENT us and set idiots straight on issues like this.

[adorno]

Remember the Democrats really sought Alcohol prohibition as a solution. Remember how that worked out?

No, I don't remember. I'm surprised there's still someone that does. ;)

Anyhow, whatever the issue, and whatever the democrats' stance on it, they're being completely phony about it. Power and control is all they're after, and it doesn't matter how they gain it, including controlling the minds of their constituents, who have become, basically, zombies after all of the false promises and who are being bought with the promises of free stuff, aka: bribes.