Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Svartalfiar
The mass public shooting is one where the gunman is shooting at just about anything he sees moving

But why does the word "public" belong in a phrase that defines mass shootings that are neither family nor gang shootings? Wouldn't "targeting random victims" be more accurate than "public?"

29 posted on 11/25/2018 2:26:24 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
But why does the word "public" belong in a phrase that defines mass shootings that are neither family nor gang shootings? Wouldn't "targeting random victims" be more accurate than "public?"

It kind of would, but remember, this wording came out back when you didn;t have liberals twisting 1/3 of the vocabulary to mean something different. By 'mass public shooting', they mean a shooting that targets the public at large. A gunman who isn't aiming for anyone specific, but just whomever shows up on his radar.
30 posted on 11/26/2018 4:12:23 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson