[pepsionice]

Well...it creates a problem for evolutionists and creationists.

First, if you read the entire piece....they don’t say 100-percent of animals reviewed in this study went through the same timeline as the humans....only 90-percent. So 10-percent have nothing to do with the human timeline. That creates a enormous hole for both groups to fill. If we were talking about three animals...you might be able to make up some story, but this gets into several thousand.

Second, once these animals in the 90-percent group come through this doorway with Father-1 and Mother-1...how did they reach the far shores of Australia, the Americas, Asia, etc? You would require an army of Arks to deliver each pair to the correct geographical location. Again, you’d have to really be creative to invent a story to explain how American buffalo got delivered in their spot, and how Moas got delivered to New Zealand.

I think what this story has generally accomplished....all of the scientists now have to go back and review Africa (this launch-site for the human race) and find a totally different circumstance that works with the DNA storyline.

[dynoman]

From the article; "'This conclusion is very surprising,' Thaler admitted, 'and I fought against it as hard as I could.'"

He and his fellow evolution believers are going to cram it into the evolution box anyway.

[gnarledmaw]

Multiple arks? Could have been carried by swallows...

[Bellflower]

The world had many ice bridges that later melted. Also, later there were land links that are no more.