Huh?
“We scammed people with cheap goods” is good advertising?
DUPED....LOL
That’s what I was wondering.
From the article:
The shoppers got their money back, but were allowed to keep the shoes.
They weren't scammed at all. Payless convinced them brilliantly. That was the whole point of the exercise.
It's BRILLIANT advertising. They just convinced a bunch of luxury shoe shoppers that they can get great deals at Payless for quality products.
Also, if you read the article, you would see that everybody "scammed" got their money back AND got to keep the shoes.
Everybody was a winner here. Except the "luxury" shoe stores on Park Avenue that might now see less foot traffic (pardon the pun).
I have a closet full of Louboutins and Giuseppe Zanotti. Yeah I can’t believe I paid that much for shoes sometimes but they are works of art. Beautiful workmanship. Loubies are handmade. I guarantee I can tell the difference even in sneakers. If you really know high end lines you know Palessi is fake so must have been a bunch of stupid liberals who fall for anything.
It works for the Democrats!
The shoppers got their money back, but were allowed to keep the shoes.
“We scammed people with cheap goods,” is good advertising?
I don’t know, but it appears to working well for Nike.