Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

My main issue with this is : if they can’t be held liable they shouldn’t be allowed to pick and choose what customers say either - or they should at least have to hire outside to make the decision if they are getting off the hook.


4 posted on 12/14/2018 2:33:26 PM PST by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: reed13k
My position is that communications companies larger than a certain size, say a million users or so, and which bill themselves as a public access system, should not be able to regulate user speech except for clearly illegal postings.

Google is regulating it's traffic to suppress conservative speech, and to promote liberal speech. Their search results routinely reflect their own preferred biases, and not a objective search result that people think they are getting.

Google is becoming a serious threat, and other communications companies are becoming threats as well, although lesser threats than Google.

6 posted on 12/14/2018 2:38:16 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson