Replies

The replier cites the fact that the lecture was OPTIONAL as a mitigating factor:

I don’t get that. He voluntarily CHOSE to attend that lecture, ergo he was honor bound to ask no questions..? He SHOULD have agreed with everything, since he didn’t have to be there..?

I don’t follow that logic at all.

And there’s more:

“He acted ERRATICALLY at the library..?” So...he asked —AXED, sorry!— where the card catalogue was, maybe..?

At this school, any type of whacko reasoning seems possible.

Hey how many times do cops say, “Hey if you’re not doing anything WRONG, you shouldn’t mind if we FILM, right?” And they will cite that same reasoning if they audio recording you.

Yet when Keiran snaps their photo or records them, they get all ticked off.

Doesn’t that same reasoning mean the COMMITTEE was doing something wrong..?

It sounds like UVA’s problem with “erratic, weird” Kieran is that he takes his education seriously, that he takes IDEAS seriously, that he values reason and disagreeing agreeably.

KIERAN is the professor here, not UVA.

UVA needs to learn at Kieran’s knee. They owe him serious CA$H.

STAY “WEIRD”, KIERAN..!!!

He neeeds to contact Dinesh D’Souza and get HIM to ask UVA a question or two, maybe make a little FILM out of it.